FlounderModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
FlounderIm considering entering this one into a local competition and was hoping for a critique on how it is presented here. Quite a dark exposure because im trying to portray the animals natural blending in behaviour with the dark substrate. But Is it too dark?
Cheers Steve Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: FlounderI like it, Steve, but I do think it is a bit dark.
Re: FlounderIs it going to be printed for the comp? if so I, think it may look better printed than on the monitor, especially if its A3 or greater.
In terms of brightness, maybe a shade too dark, but not by much, maybe play with brightening a little and adding a fraction more contrast? all in all I think it would only need minor tweaks in the PP to get a printed version looking good. Compositionally I think its quite good, it definitely conveys the blending with the surrounding environment and one does not have to look at it for 5 mins to work wtf it is. The line of the body in the foreground is a nice touch to lead teh eyes to the eyes of teh fish! I cannot think of a different crop that would improve the image. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Flounder
Thanks for letting me know!
Its an online comp, so i will have to have a think about reprocessing it. Thanks also for the critique. Because they pop out of the back of the fish, the eyes really stand out at you once you figure out what you atre looking at Last edited by Willy wombat on Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: FlounderVery tasty little creatures.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Flounder
I agree, although this one was a bit on the small side. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: FlounderI've looked using two screens. I agree it's a little dark. If you print this, it will be even darker (unless your printer is perfectly calibrated with your screen).
Perhaps lift the midtone a little without affecting shadows? It's a tough one as the tones are relatively even overall.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|