Wedding CritiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wedding CritiqueMy First big wedding Any suggestions or critisism welcome they do look difft on my un-calibrated monitor
#1 [imghttp://farm5.static.flickr.com/4026/4705812404_1578b9c7e0_b.jpg][/img] #2 #3 Cheers Jim
Re: Wedding CritiqueHey Jim. Congrats on surviving your first wedding.
#1 is awesome, love the high key look. I would be inclined to crop some from the right, and extend the left to decentralize a bit. #2 is a great composition and pose, nicely lit too. The processing seems to have done something odd to the bokeh though. #3 I think the noise is overdone a bit, otherwise very nice. Fixed link to #1
Re: Wedding CritiqueHI Thanks for the feed back Kevin the processing is with the Nic Software and the #2 was using Dynamic Skin Softener.
It looks weird on my non calibrated monitor but printed well?? So I could brush on the effect or erase/mask the layer where its not needed.The Hi Key look was from the siver ex software within Nic and I think with a bit of a fine tune this will give great results.ALso the backrpond wall to #1 was purple so it was a good fix to go B&W Cheers Jim
Re: Wedding CritiqueThe first one is very nice, she has great form and a great smile to boot and you have shown both off nicely! My only suggestion on that one is a slightly tighter crop, all that space is not adding much for me.
All the images seem to be oversharpened? is that just me? I am not soo keen on the over grainy style on the 3rd image and the vignetting is a bit much for me, I would back that off about 75% All images have decent compositions and thats the key, the rest is elementary. I have no idea about weddings so I could just be talking out my ass. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Wedding CritiqueThanks for the feedback Biggery where-ever the comments come from is all good
cheers jim
Re: Wedding CritiqueSome nice photos there Jim.
IMAGE 1 Lovely portrait of the bride, very relaxed. I would lighten up her face since its facing away from the light source. Also just watch how you process these as banding is quite evident here. IMAGE 2 Lovely portrait of the couple. I would have asked the groom to tilt his head the other way as it looks like the bride is leaning to heavily on his head and asked him to hold her hips with his free hand. I would also correct the white balance as its a bit cool making the dress look blue. IMAGE 3: Least of my fave. Only because of the processing done, it looks very antiquated. I'm sure this would have looked good without the white vignetting. Good job overall considering its your first wedding. NO EASY FEAT
Re: Wedding CritiqueDid you use fill flash in the first image? The eyes seem dark, as if you've pulled them out of the shadows. The whites of the eyes have no sparkle and I think the eyes are a very important area in any portrait. The images are well composed and you have posed the couple well. Just a little refinement in lighting will improve the images and take them to the next level.
Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|