Fire in the skyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Fire in the skyI Was lucky enough to witness a pretty decent sunset recently. Managed to rush to Belmont just in time for the good light which lasted only for 5 minutes. This place is very peaceful during sunset and is highly recommended visit if you are in the area.
There was a wedding photographer doing a few shots but they left before the nice light! For your C&C as usual.
Re: Fire in the skyVery purty and dramatic too. The use of very-wide focal length really adds a nice punch to the image.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Re: Fire in the skyThe long exposure adds a bit of drama to the clouds. Well captured.
Re: Fire in the skyDude, creative genius at work ay ? hahaha
Love love love the venetian masks you have in your album, the colors and detail are amazing! I think.. professionally I'd also like to note myself as a "venetian mask product photographer" haha ultimate job! Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Fire in the skyLooks great. talk about being at the right place at the right time!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Fire in the skynot too shabby for someone
Nice stuff Suren, it looks very representative of the scene but has some nice dynamic range, i do not have much to add than that. Maybe a pano style might have been an option? would definitely need extra shots since you would not want to lose any of that sky or foreground... I can spot some lens spots on the filter there (i think), you were using a small aperture? I often get similiar spots but not 100% sure how to avoid other than using larger aperture... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Fire in the skyGreat work Suren. Looks like you caught the magic and the wedding photog didn't, luck of the game
Love the way the clouds look. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Fire in the skyThanks killakoala, glamy for your comments.
This was taken on the 26th when you were in NC...
This could still be true though...
Thanks Marc, but which ones??? I didn't think I had any.
Didn't think of that. There aren't many more foreground focal points in this scene but that may not matter for a pano as much. Hmm.. Next time. Thanks for the suggestion.
Those are rain drops. I hung around a little more despite the rain for this shot. They often say that the last shot is best. I think that was true in this case!
Perhaps! Maybe they moved to another location though. Yeah, I was just relaxing by the lake while they were working hard I guess. Thanks again to everyone who commented.
Re: Fire in the sky
I must be really slow...did I miss something in that picture? gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Fire in the skySome nice colour in this image, ........ if you know how to use Photoshop you can straighten the verticals in this image....... a change of exposure and f stop would have improved the water movement. More detail in the wharf would also have helped. The sign "Public Access Jetty" and white small pole above distracts from the overall look.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Fire in the skyThanks Big pix.
I will have a go at strightening the verticals. Are you suggesting more or less water movement? I was unable to get the shutter any lower without blowing the highlights in the -2EV image so had to make do. [My wideangle filterholder only holds one filter - in this case it could have been the ND8 or reverse ND grad - can't remember] Agree that a little bit more detail on the jetty would be good. I will have another look at my brackets. The white small pole is a compositional issue and I haven't yet found a balanced composition in this location which doesn't include it. As you know this location well, I will keep an eye out for your compositions.
Re: Fire in the skyoooh sexy
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|