| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by stubbsy on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:39 pm
 I have a dilemma.  I find the Sydney Opera  House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still     Last Saturday was no exception and the three images below all appeal to me.  Trouble is I can't decide whether up close or pulled back a little makes for a stronger image.  That's where you guys come in - tell me what image is the most compelling for you (or are all 3 just crap)Opera -House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-L.jpg" alt="Image" />Opera -House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-L.jpg" alt="Image" />Opera -House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by leek on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:59 pm
 All three look good to me Peter, but the composition of 1 & 3 in particular seems to work well... Well done... You did well to find something not commonly seen. 
			
				 leek
Senior Member Posts: 3135Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pmLocation: Lane Cove, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by fozzie on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:01 pm
 Hi Peter, I personally prefer the third. Displaying strong lines of the 'Mistress' together with depth of the over hang of the high pitch shell. Looks like you are mastering the D700  fozzie
 When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
 
			
				 fozzie
Key Member Posts: 2806Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pmLocation: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:06 pm
 Interesting shots Peter, al very similiar compositions and the ones that stands out, and only by a nose, is #1, there is a definite feel of patterns and juxtaposed lines (man.. I have sooo wanted to use that word for sooo long now    ) and I feel this is more prevalent in the first then the others. All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end? I find the Sydney Opera  House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still
 I could say something...but I had better not      
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by wendellt on Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:27 am
 i'll never get tired of shooting the opera house
 the first image is the best by far because
 1. It has alot of architectural element dimensions, the sweeping sails, the windows, the staircase and the foundation
 all of these things you have framed with skill in 1 image
 
 2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.
 
 3. the crop is great because unlike the 2nd image you have cropped out the metal bar at the right side that is out of place and destroys the synergy between all the elements
 
 All i would do is desaturate the blue sky so its more like a darker grey blue to make it look more dramatic, the tone of the sky looks too vibrant and sort of unreal
 
 the 3rd image is good but somehow the centering of the subject doesn't fondle the mind
 
			
				 wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.) Posts: 4078Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 amLocation: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by petermmc on Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:28 am
 No 1 stands out for me. The straightish lines of the bottom section reflect stability and the curve of the top reflects creativity. Nicely done. Sky is also beautiful. Might be interesting in B&W.
 Peter Mc
 Nikon & Olympus 
			
				 petermmc
Senior Member Posts: 504Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pmLocation: Figtree, Wollongong 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by CraigVTR on Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:56 pm
 wendellt wrote:2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.
  Wendell beat me to it.  It is obviously architectural but unless you know the opera house it can keep you guessing.CraigLifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride."
 D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head.  SB800 x 2.
 
			
				 CraigVTR
Senior Member Posts: 1243Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pmLocation: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Matt. K on Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:35 pm
 PeterBoth #1 and #2 work very well. The composition in #3 is a little weak because of the white mass on the bottom left hand corner. It weakens the image by dragging the eye down to that point.
 Regards
 Matt. K
 
			
				 Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM Posts: 9981Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pmLocation: North Nowra 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:01 am
 I prefer #1. It could be any building, but it's the SOH from a unique angle. Very different and very nice. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:11 am
 Another different point of view! I like! CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:25 am
 Peter, For me it's #1. Hands down. First of all, it's somewhat misleading, as it almost looks like it could be a bridge of some sort, but it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome.  g.Gary Stark
 Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
 The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
 
			
				 gstark
Site Admin Posts: 22926Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pmLocation: Bondi, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Ant on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:47 am
 I have to agree with #1.  I like 1 and 3 as a set though, you look at 1, wonder what it is, look at 3 and then the penny drops! D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600 
			
				 Ant
Member Posts: 304Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pmLocation: Lyndhurst, Melbourne
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by colin_12 on Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:08 am
 Peter this may not help but I prefer #1 and #3. Would hedge toward #1 more though.  Regards ColinCameras, lenses and a lust for life
 
			
				 colin_12
Senior Member Posts: 1853Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pmLocation: Hazelbrook 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by stubbsy on Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:40 pm
 Thank you all for your comments. biggerry wrote:All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end?
 I noticed that too Gerry.  It's in the jpeg versions, but not the original.  Nothing I could do could eliminate it so I gave up. gstark wrote:it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome.
 Well I did straighten it a little, but I think I'd pass muster with this one.    I've taken the advice on board and slightly reworked #1 to lighten and slightly desaturate the sky.  Here's the result (it's also a slightly wider crop).  As seems to be the consensus my preference is for #1 and then #3.Opera -House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> 
			
				 stubbsy
Moderator Posts: 10748Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pmLocation: Newcastle NSW - D700
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |