Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by stubbsy on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:39 pm
I have a dilemma. I find the Sydney Opera House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still Last Saturday was no exception and the three images below all appeal to me. Trouble is I can't decide whether up close or pulled back a little makes for a stronger image. That's where you guys come in - tell me what image is the most compelling for you (or are all 3 just crap) Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2767/989374536_qePYC-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2764/989379248_KJa3p-L.jpg" alt="Image" /> Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2759/989373730_pdBNq-L.jpg" alt="Image" />
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by leek on Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:59 pm
All three look good to me Peter, but the composition of 1 & 3 in particular seems to work well... Well done... You did well to find something not commonly seen.
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by fozzie on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:01 pm
Hi Peter, I personally prefer the third. Displaying strong lines of the 'Mistress' together with depth of the over hang of the high pitch shell. Looks like you are mastering the D700 
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-

fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by biggerry on Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:06 pm
Interesting shots Peter, al very similiar compositions and the ones that stands out, and only by a nose, is #1, there is a definite feel of patterns and juxtaposed lines (man.. I have sooo wanted to use that word for sooo long now  ) and I feel this is more prevalent in the first then the others. All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end? I find the Sydney Opera House a tantalising mistress - everyone has had her yet she tempts me still
I could say something...but I had better not 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by wendellt on Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:27 am
i'll never get tired of shooting the opera house
the first image is the best by far because 1. It has alot of architectural element dimensions, the sweeping sails, the windows, the staircase and the foundation all of these things you have framed with skill in 1 image
2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.
3. the crop is great because unlike the 2nd image you have cropped out the metal bar at the right side that is out of place and destroys the synergy between all the elements
All i would do is desaturate the blue sky so its more like a darker grey blue to make it look more dramatic, the tone of the sky looks too vibrant and sort of unreal
the 3rd image is good but somehow the centering of the subject doesn't fondle the mind
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by petermmc on Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:28 am
No 1 stands out for me. The straightish lines of the bottom section reflect stability and the curve of the top reflects creativity. Nicely done. Sky is also beautiful. Might be interesting in B&W.
Peter Mc
Nikon & Olympus
-

petermmc
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
- Location: Figtree, Wollongong
by CraigVTR on Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:56 pm
wendellt wrote:2. The angle it is taken at shows artistic flair and lots of thought. It also portrays the subject differently and it's not obvious that its the opera house.
Wendell beat me to it. It is obviously architectural but unless you know the opera house it can keep you guessing.
Craig Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
-

CraigVTR
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
- Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
-
by Matt. K on Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Peter Both #1 and #2 work very well. The composition in #3 is a little weak because of the white mass on the bottom left hand corner. It weakens the image by dragging the eye down to that point.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by ozimax on Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:01 am
I prefer #1. It could be any building, but it's the SOH from a unique angle. Very different and very nice.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:11 am
Another different point of view! I like!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:25 am
Peter, For me it's #1. Hands down. First of all, it's somewhat misleading, as it almost looks like it could be a bridge of some sort, but it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Ant on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:47 am
I have to agree with #1. I like 1 and 3 as a set though, you look at 1, wonder what it is, look at 3 and then the penny drops!
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
-

Ant
- Member
-
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
- Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne
-
by colin_12 on Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:08 am
Peter this may not help but I prefer #1 and #3. Would hedge toward #1 more though. 
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by stubbsy on Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:40 pm
Thank you all for your comments. biggerry wrote:All the images seem to have some banding in teh blue sky, or is that just my end?
I noticed that too Gerry. It's in the jpeg versions, but not the original. Nothing I could do could eliminate it so I gave up. gstark wrote:it's also one that passes muster as something that EnergyPolice would approve of, as clearly, there's been little that you've done in post to achieve this outcome.
Well I did straighten it a little, but I think I'd pass muster with this one. I've taken the advice on board and slightly reworked #1 to lighten and slightly desaturate the sky. Here's the result (it's also a slightly wider crop). As seems to be the consensus my preference is for #1 and then #3. Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-O.jpg" class="postlink">  Opera-House/PRS2767/993708452_hM4ks-L.jpg" alt="Image" />
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|