Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Postby biggerry on Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:15 pm

Well its only taken me...9 months to get thru half of the images I took from Western Australia

2 images that summed up the highest point in our trip and also teh best Beach.

This one was a 4 or 5 shot pano after a 2 and half hour hike.

Image

A view looking back on our campsite from the heights of nearby handgliding launch point

Image
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Postby surenj on Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:24 pm

Gerry these are noice. What's the secret to your pano technique? focal length? Handheld? How much overlap? Any manual edits? :wink: How did you get away with the polariser on? :shock:

I quite like the vague 'S' curve composition on the first. The NZ like haze is quite nice as well. I am undecided about the rocky outcrop on the RHS. I could have been tempted to add another on the left hand side but would violate the 4 minute rule. [although pano would take more than 4 minutes? :wink: ]

#2 I keep wanting to take a frame to the left and combine and to remove a little bit of 'dead' trees from the RHS.

hth.

Want to see more.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Postby aim54x on Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:30 pm

Gerry, its images like this that make me keep viewing this section of the forum. You really have become one of the best Landscape/Pano contributers here.

I love the layered effect of the first image. There needs to be a bit more cloud, but then again you cant help that. The peaks just lead you into the images..... :cheers:

The beach is not as strong an image, a fine image, but just not quite up to the standard of the first. I am not sure about the white sand bisecting the image, i would have tried to get it further off centre.

Keep them coming mate!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Postby colin_12 on Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:27 pm

Very nice as usual Gerry. :up:
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Tallest Peak in WA? The best Beach in WA?

Postby biggerry on Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:07 pm

surenj wrote:Gerry these are noice. What's the secret to your pano technique? focal length? Handheld? How much overlap? Any manual edits? How did you get away with the polariser on?


not really much a secret really, these were both with the 17-55mm in the middle of the range which gives nice flat images to stitch together, at 17mm stitching is still very usable but need to be a bit more careful.

All handheld, there is no way I would carry a tripod (of any kind) that far :) Overlaps are usually at least 1/3 to 1/2 or less when there is movement involved. Usually always leave teh polariser on, just means you have to select your composition carefully, make sure the strongest effect of the polariser is at one end of teh pano. The advantages of the CPL (saturation, no reflection, nice sky) far out weighs any negatives especially when photographying in teh middle of the day.

No manual edits on these, sometimes on tricky ones like seacapes or shots with movement you need to work hard to get them to stitch.

surenj wrote:tempted to add another on the left hand side but would violate the 4 minute rule. [although pano would take more than 4 minutes? ]


lol, the best panos only take a short time to edit, but can take several minutes to stitch and produce tiff/psd file. I do hear what your saying about the rocky outcrop, I should have been standing over there on that outcrop!

aim54x wrote:The beach is not as strong an image, a fine image, but just not quite up to the standard of the first. I am not sure about the white sand bisecting the image, i would have tried to get it further off centre.
surenj wrote:#2 I keep wanting to take a frame to the left and combine and to remove a little bit of 'dead' trees from the RHS.


ahh yes, now I look at it the image is definitely off centre, needs more one the left and less on teh right....will revisit that since I think i have a few extra images on each side.. :up:

colin_12 wrote:Very nice as usual Gerry. :up:

aim54x wrote:Gerry, its images like this that make me keep viewing this section of the forum. You really have become one of the best Landscape/Pano contributers here.

surenj wrote:Gerry these are noice.


ta guys
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques