PortraitModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: PortraitIts a great image, but there is one thing that does tarnish it for me; that out of focus foliage that appears to be reaching towards her nostril!
keep the good work coming! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: PortraitExcellent photo but yes, I agree with Cameron, a position just an inch or two sideways would have made the image perfect. Good in any case!
Ozi President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: PortraitThis is one time when taking a moment, before squeezing the shutter, to cast your eye around the viewfinder and examine what you're about to shoot would really have paid dividends. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: PortraitThanks guys
I did think the same and wanted to clone them out but that turned out to be beyond my capabilities and my computers =) It is a shame as i think i captured the moment well but missed the framing =( It was difficult controlling all those grass fronds =)
Re: PortraitI tend to agree with the above...
Re: PortraitOn the positive side, I really love the tones in this. The greens and orange go so well together. Deep blacks also add quite alot.
Cloning this would be quite a job but probably doable. Several hours though [I think]. The hard part would be to remove the OOF fronds altogether. You could try copying her jawline from the other side?
Re: Portraitits a great portrait with a believable and honest smile
although i think the shadow tones are a bit too much keeping this shot naturally toned would be better Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: PortraitA couple if ideas for taming waving grass.
Yes Gary, I know you should wait for the moment, but sometimes you or the model just don't have the time or the split second reflexes. 1. Take a burst on high speed. Hopefully one will have the wayward grass behaving itself. 2. Put a weight on the offending fronds. I have often used a peg to good effect here, but a book will work well too. Be careful of colour casts though. Of course you can often use these to good effect. 3. (shudder) Snip. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Portrait
Depending upon the proximity of the fronds, it may be possible for either you or the model to hold them out of the way for a second or three; I've often done that with overhanging tree branches. Conversely, I've also been known to hold a branch so that it intrudes into an upper corner of an image, to offer framing. But before you can treat the problem you need to notice that it is a problem, hence my suggestion of a quick glance around the viewfinder, or perhaps a little chimping post-exposure. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: PortraitThanks guys for all the replies! Some great ideas there for the future.
Surenj - Yeah i think it would take a couple of hours work to clone them out. I think it'll be faster to drive back there and take another =) I tend to agree with Wendellt now that i see this picture on my work monitor. I think i've overdone the shadow tones a bit too much. I'll pull them back a bit. Mr Darcy - some great ideas there. i'll pocket those for next time. I think a stick also might have been useful to hold them back down low out of frame. But i didn't want it to look like the grass was parted artificially too much. So maybe the high speed burst is the way to go! gstark - I'm going to start trying to see distracting objects when i'm composing. At the moment i've been so focused on just composing a nice frame that I tend to miss these things. Practice will make perfect though. Thanks again guys for all the comments it definitely improves my photography and is great for someone just starting out like me. Regards Dave
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|