Rose Leaf macroModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Rose Leaf macroThis is a macro shot i did after rains last week. The red/purple is enhanced a little from the original but not a long way from the original. What should i have done different?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kwijibot/5440689844/lightbox/
Re: Rose Leaf macroVery nice, the water drops are great... possibly not had that leaf on the left maybe...
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Rose Leaf macro
embbed the image in the post http://www.flickr.com/help/photos/#2265887 Now onto the picture, what could you have done differently? a million things I guess, are you happy with the image? what are you trying to portray? Do you think it has enough depth? (not DOF either) In hindsight, I would have looked at trying to get the vein of the leaf at an angle so it intersects the bottom RH corner - this could also be achieved on that image with some rotation and crop, it might also separate the image into thirds too. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Rose Leaf macroI agree with Gerry here.......What were you trying to acheive or what did you want to be different?
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Rose Leaf macroIt has been said twice already, but it bears repeating.
For this type of photography, you need a goal. Without that you cannot achieve it. Without knowing what it was, we cannot really comment. For example: "I want to take a photo of a rose bush" Answer: step back and stop down "I want to photograph that bee" Answer: make sure it is in shot when you squeeze the trigger "I want an 'arty' photo to go with my decor" Answer: You have largely achieved this, depending on your decor. Perhaps lower the ISO to reduce the evident noise (or reduce it in Post), and perhaps blur the in focus object in the lower right corner. and so on. Actually, with all photography you need a goal, but it is generally self evident: "I want to show off the bride's dress", "I want to record my holiday", "I want to get people to buy this product" and so on. Oh and as Gerry says, learn to embed the photo so people don't have to navigate away in order to see it. In general you use the syntax
See Gerry's link for how to get the photo's address from Flickr. Hint, you use the bbCode version. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Rose Leaf macro
This will go nicely on large canvas. Keep em coming.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|