Slow shutter speeds - Sea RocksModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Slow shutter speeds - Sea RocksWith the kind use of Andre's filters, I headed out on Thursday night for some attempts at very slow shutter speed images of the ocean.
Interested in your thoughts. Now with this one, I was hoping the full moon would stay out longer to capture its reflection on the water, but alas it was fleeting. It is apparent towards the centre of the image but not as obvious a I had hoped. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea RocksWhile the slow shutter speeds are nice and apparent, I am not a fan of these compositions.
Do you have any other compos to show?
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea Rocks
Not significantly different to these. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea Rocks
i dont think that would even be possible with any kind of distinguishable features unless it was a composite image. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea Rocks
This was similar to what I had in mind. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea Rocks
gotcha. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea RocksI like the first one best. It has an eerie appeal. Before reading
your comments I thought you took them in the afternoon or morning of a clouded day.
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea Rocks
Tough shot to pull off with good foreground detail. I reckon if I was to try, I'd expose for the moon and composite the very long exposure for the foreground. Otherwise the moon will move too much. Also, you'd get some stars if present. If you use the grads the stars might be dimmed out.
Re: Slow shutter speeds - Sea RocksPatrick, the first thing we all do when armed with a new effect is go out and try and master the technique/effect, this is usually done at teh expense of composition (I have been a culprit of this many a time!)
The first image is the only one where the composition rings my bell, the BW is an interestign idea, but I am left wanting to see the colour version. Now that you have the effect sorted you can concentrate on getting a composition where teh effect compliments it rather that over powers it. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|