Alex

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Feb 27, 2011 8:31 pm

Here are some shots of Alex that I loved - I really like the use of negative space with some portraits. I think it adds something that I can't put my finger on.

C&C appreciated.

[not sure why smugmug is being a pain in the arse for linking photos, so using flickr. Hope they work]

Image

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Alex

Postby aim54x on Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:04 pm

I'd like to see the first image cropped to exclude the black window...but retaining the window sill.

#2 is great as is
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Alex

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:22 pm

If you want the negative space in the first one, I'd suggest cropping out the entire window so that the only background is the wall.

The second one is great as is :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Alex

Postby biggerry on Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:39 pm

Nice stuff Patrick, I am gonna say I like the window in the first - it adds a sense of balance to the image, for me it did not immediately draw my eye away from the subject, but rather they wandered there after looking at Alex. Also the fact that the window is black and this compliments nicely with the small amount of black showing of Alex's pants.

The second image, not particularly taken by the PP, but it could grow on me, standby on that. The LH foot looks too dark though, I would match it's 'lightness' to the other foot or close to, since it is in a shadow.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:02 am

Thanks for the comments.

I did leave the painting (commonly referred to as a window :lol: ) in the first to provide some balance, but will look at a cropped version.

Gerry - I will try to fix up the left foot in the second.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Alex

Postby surenj on Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:04 pm

Really love that picture frame in the shot! Keep it. :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Alex

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:08 pm

Patrick - the element of space in the first pic (an excellent concept) fails through having the picture distraction. Remove it and you will have reached your goal :up:

Both pics are excellent.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Alex

Postby colin_12 on Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:16 pm

Both nice Patrick. Next time you have him sitting still :lol: maybe try to get him to look into the negative space for a shot like the second.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:27 pm

Ok, I actually agree with you lot (except Gerry) and cropping out the dark section of the painting removes the distraction.

What do you think? [printing out on Harman Warmtone Paper is da goods]

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Alex

Postby biggerry on Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:03 pm

Reschsmooth wrote: I actually agree with you lot (except Gerry)


lol, I am sticking to my guns here, I like the picture frame! However at the end of the day its what you think, thats important thing - irrespective of the frame in or out its still a great image and will bring back fond memories in the future. :up: :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:11 pm

biggerry wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote: I actually agree with you lot (except Gerry)


lol, I am sticking to my guns here, I like the picture frame! However at the end of the day its what you think, thats important thing - irrespective of the frame in or out its still a great image and will bring back fond memories in the future. :up: :up:


The other deciding factor is that the resultant crop is 8x10 to fit in a frame.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Alex

Postby gstark on Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:16 am

Patrick,

All three of these images are excellent, and with excellent use of negative space.

Just to be different, I'm going to suggest yet another crop for the first. I would like to see this with just a small sliver of black from the painting at the top. I don't know if that will work, but I think it may give you the balance that you're seeking, without being too distracting.

Certainly, this should be printed on warm paper (but cold would be brilliant too) but not at 8x10. That's way to small - go to at least 16x20 here
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:04 am

Gary,

I will try the alternative crop suggestion, although may have to do so without consideration of the 4:5 ratio (or otherwise crop more of the bottom).

I would like to print bigger and may do so - I think I was lucky that day that the light, composition and pose by Alex just lined up nicely.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Alex

Postby the foto fanatic on Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:55 am

I love #2 - such a great candid.

Alex's expression in #1 is just beautiful. Sorry - can't add to the debate about the negative space. Go with your gut.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Alex

Postby Div on Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:29 am

Great photos and something i had never thought about.

I'm going to agree with Biggerry here and say that the picture frame (formerly known as the window) does balance the photo but is not too distracting. The frame is just out of focus so your eye is still drawn to the subject first. Then when you step back from the image you get that nice black balance as Gerry said.

But I love the concept and will think about it next time i'm taking portraits.

-Dave
Div
Member
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Turner


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques