Re visitingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re visitingWell, today being a day off i've been revisiting some old images from 2009. Came across my first ever wedding shoot, and discovered a few images I hadn't used, for some unknown reason, and well here is one of them, touched up a little bit, but I love it. I like that there is no eye contact and the soft light filtering through from the background. Please tell me what you think, I am considering re visiting more of the photo's as my editing abilities changed drastically in the last two years. So CC more then welcome, rather invited!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Re visitingI love it.
The bride is distracted by something, with beautiful soft front lighting and a nice rim-light effect. Exposure and wb are spot on. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Re visiting
[due to sheer laziness, although I could have written something meaningful in the time it took me to write this explanation of why I resorted to a simple emoticon ] Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Re visitingDid you end up giving this one to the bride?? Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Re visitingI reckon everything is in place for this image to be strong on it's own without much skin softening. Do you have an un-soft skin version for us to compare?
Re: Re visitingThanks guys for your comments, all are appreciated. Surrenj i'm attaching a non softened version, i think i prefer the softened version but there isn't a massive difference. But i think it certainly softened the shoulder which i think stands out a little too much in the image without the softening of the skin.
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Re visitingcracking shot, even though there is no eye contact it still feels like a strong image...
a bit more PP might be order, it feels a bit darker at my end, could be my monitor though. here's my thoughts (note, let me know if you want it removed) gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|