Botanical Wonderland

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Botanical Wonderland

Postby biggerry on Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:21 am

Well after a failed attempt at sunrise and sunset, I did have a pleasant walk around the Royal Bontanical Gardens after having a brief look at the Art Gallery and the Australian Landscapes 1970s-

This place always has a plethora of subjects, whether it be people, bugs, botanics or city scapes it never lets you down, I really should get there more often, the last time I was there was years and years ago.

Anyway a couple of images that I would love to have some critique and thoughts on, all very everyday and mundane subjects but its always fun to try and make then interesting in composition and effect.

Image

Image

how much does this look like some upmarket entre?!

Image

Image


Image
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby surenj on Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:38 am

#4 is a clear winner in my mind! :cheers: Great freezing of the action and gets immediate interest to try and figure out what subject it is!

#1 I would have removed that green grass before taking the shot :mrgreen: Yeah I know it wouldn't be allowed in the botanical gardens but I think I would be doing them a favour anyways... :chook:

#2 is excellent tones and light here.

#4 and #2 are definite canvas candidates. Blow em up! :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby bigsarg7 on Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:09 am

:agree: #2 and #4 def canvas .... esp #2.....enlarge it and do it. looks gr8!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
User avatar
bigsarg7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 667
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: Goulburn Valley (Victoria, Australia)

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby Remorhaz on Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:24 am

#1 even before reading Suren's comment - remove the grass :)

#2 I reckon this might look better in monochrome (shapes not colour) :)
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby colin_12 on Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:11 pm

2 and 3 are great shots Gerry, but #4 is a corker. :cheers:
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby aim54x on Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:21 pm

Amazing work as always Gerry!

Glad to see you made the most of what was a rather grey day
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby biggerry on Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:42 pm

Its interestign how people like #4, that image does not really rock my world, I mean its nice and has a quaint effect with the high shutter and water droplets, but I feel it lacks a compelling composition to compliment the effect. I guess that slight mystery of what the subject is (nipple?NSFW) adds to it as well..

I do like #2, I have for some time wanted to get a nice green succulent image of one of these plants.

surenj wrote:#1 I would have removed that green grass before taking the shot

Remorhaz wrote:#1 even before reading Suren's comment - remove the grass


yeah prolly should have, did not even realise until I go home how much it stuck out like dog ...

Remorhaz wrote:#2 I reckon this might look better in monochrome (shapes not colour)

I did consider this but had my heart set on a succulent green image :)

aim54x wrote:you made the most of what was a rather grey day


yeah, sometimes ya just gotta play it by ear, if the sky ain't playing then look else where - I reckon saying its too cloudly or wet outside is a cop out for not taking pictures :up: :up:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby Geoff M on Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:18 pm

Nice punchy images all round. I like the second one most off all and I have a very similar image in my library of images. I seem to recall running the Fractalius plugin over it too which was quite effective and an interesting result. If I can track it down I may well post a copy here if that's OK with you Gerry?
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby stubbsy on Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:07 pm

Gerry

I love the tonal simplicity of #2 - it's just such a wonderful image.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Botanical Wonderland

Postby biggerry on Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:33 pm

Geoff M wrote:If I can track it down I may well post a copy here if that's OK with you Gerry?



by all means Geoff!, sorry I only just came back to this thread!

stubbsy wrote:I love the tonal simplicity of #2 - it's just such a wonderful image.


simple is something I overlook sometimes! thanks peter.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques