Too much negative space?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Too much negative space?

Postby Geoff on Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:24 pm

Hey there peoples.
It's been some time since I've posted an image, so here's one from a recent family shoot.
I quite like this shot but was wondering if you thought there was too much negative space on the right?

I don't think there is but value the opinion of the folks on here.

Cheers.

Image

and another B&W cropped in much closer, which I think I prefer..hmmm?

Image
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby chrisk on Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:57 pm

the negative space isn't the issue, the issue is that the baby is close to the edge of the frame on the left. imho, it doesnt work cos of that.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby Geoff M on Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:01 pm

Geoff, I think the negative space is OK, but you also need some extra space on the LHS. I also find the adult finger a distraction in this image.

Nice conversion in the B&W and IMHO is the better of the two images presented here. What is lacking in this image though is direct eye contact, I am guessing you had somebody trying to attract the babies attention behind and above you?
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby Geoff M on Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:03 pm

Rooz wrote:the negative space isn't the issue, the issue is that the baby is close to the edge of the frame on the left. imho, it doesnt work cos of that.
 LOL.....you beat me to it Chris, I must have been typing just as you posted!
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby Geoff on Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:26 pm

Thanks guys, great feedback.
I don't think it ruins the shot that there's not as much space on the left hand side, getting eye contact with a child this age is as you probably realise a real challenge.

I did not have an assistant with me on this shoot, which I often do..so I was trying to do the attention getting as well as the shooting.

Again, appreciate the comments :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby surenj on Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:48 pm

Also another question is whether the negative space adds to the image.

I reckon just crop to 4X6 while giving the baby head a little more breathing space (You will have the content aware fill for this one)
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Too much negative space?

Postby chrisk on Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:58 pm

geoff as a family portrait i agree its a nice shot that would find its place in a photo album.

in the context of it being a sellable shot to a paying client i dont think it would work. i actually do think its too close to the edge which makes the shot feel cramped and has a "just missed it" feel. it is also an issue cos if it is to be enlarged the matte fitted around the image will further cramp it if not cut into the head completely. a rule of thumb i have found is you need at least an inch off the sides and bottom and i prefer to give myself more like 2 or 3 just for breathing space. no one much minds the top of heads being cut off so long as it looks intentional, but the sides and bottom of faces is a no-no. the finger is also a miss and must be cloned out.

yes its hard, yes its a challenge, yes it doesn't always come off. but that's why you get paid over someone else wielding a dslr. set your bar high. just my honest 2c.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques