Portraits by Alex

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Portraits by Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:48 am

I am really impressed with the way Alex is able to hold the D200 with 50 with SB800. Using the flash is easier for exposure as I can dial up the shutter speed for him.

This is one of his (ignore the goofy subject on the right) - no cropping, just a little PP. This was taken using the Ilford FP4 compact flash card that Gary was selling on here a couple of years ago, hence the B&W.

Image

Alex loves taking photos and may look at getting him a D70 or something at Christmas.

I haven't been game to let him use the 17-35 or 85 yet. :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:57 am

Patrick,

A couple of points of order.

Reschsmooth wrote:This is one of his


I presume you have his approval to post this image here? :)

(ignore the goofy subject on the right)This was taken using the Ilford FP4 compact flash card that Gary was selling on here a couple of years ago, hence the B&W.


Not bad given the use-by date on the card you purchased. How does Alex deal with the chems in the processing of the images?

In all seriousness, this is a very nice image. I can only suggest that you do everything that you can to encourage Alex to become involved in this wonderful pasttime we all share and enjoy.

I presume that you're looking at the D70 for compatibility and pricing?

Otherwise, I'd be inclined to suggest a Sony NEX 3 or 5, not simply because it's good, but being smaller and lighter, it might be easier for the smaller hands to deal with.

Thanks for sharing this.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:02 am

gstark wrote:Patrick,

A couple of points of order.

Reschsmooth wrote:This is one of his


I presume you have his approval to post this image here? :)


I will hold all proceeds from his image sales on trust for him (very shakey trust, that is)
In all seriousness, this is a very nice image. I can only suggest that you do everything that you can to encourage Alex to become involved in this wonderful pasttime we all share and enjoy.

I presume that you're looking at the D70 for compatibility and pricing?

Otherwise, I'd be inclined to suggest a Sony NEX 3 or 5, not simply because it's good, but being smaller and lighter, it might be easier for the smaller hands to deal with.

Thanks for sharing this.


I very much want to encourage him. The D70 is suggested for:

1. Cheapness - I can't assume a 3.5 year old will continuously treat a camera well;
2. Compatibility with existing lenses;
3. My preference for teaching him to use the viewfinder. Possibly no real logical reason for this if DSLRs of the future increasingly provide viable live-view, but still. If he is going to use the Bronnie... :biglaugh:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:15 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:I will hold all proceeds from his image sales on trust for him


I can't begin to tell you how reassuring that is to hear. :)


My preference for teaching him to use the viewfinder. Possibly no real logical reason for this if DSLRs of the future increasingly provide viable live-view, but still. If he is going to use the Bronnie... :biglaugh:


A very good point, and one which I had overlooked.

On the subject of viable live view, we were using one of the new Samsungs at lunch on Sunday. The NX100, IIRC (it wasn't a Nikon, so details are of a lesser import).

I was very surprised at just how viable this camera's live view capabilities were. The image displayed no jitter, and using the super AMOLED, it was very bright with a usability angle way beyond my (un)reasonable expectations. With the camera pointed towards the subjects on my immediate left (a round table at a restaurant) I held the camera in front of me and was able to compose, focus and shoot, all with a viewing angle onto the display of something in excess of 60 degrees.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby aim54x on Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:26 pm

WOW.....

I was going to say that the FP4 card of yours must be going off.....it no longer looks like true FP4!!!

+1 for the D70!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:05 pm

aim54x wrote:WOW.....

I was going to say that the FP4 card of yours must be going off.....it no longer looks like true FP4!!!

+1 for the D70!!


He used the sepia toner as well :)
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby aim54x on Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:42 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:He used the sepia toner as well :)


Wow he is more accomplished than me! :oops:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:05 pm

Another photo by Alex...a couple of adjustments in ACR to recover the blown bits, but otherwise, almost straight out of the camera.

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby surenj on Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:50 pm

You might not need to setup tripods for self portraits anymore. Finally you can also be in the decent family photos rather than being absent in every good family photo. ;).

Nicely done. Did he use fill flash?
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:02 pm

surenj wrote:You might not need to setup tripods for self portraits anymore. Finally you can also be in the decent family photos rather than being absent in every good family photo. ;).

Nicely done. Did he use fill flash?


Alex chose manual fill at 1/128 th power to good effect :D

Thanks
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Portraits by Alex

Postby surenj on Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:00 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Alex chose manual fill at 1/128 th power to good effect

:shock: :shock: :shock:
:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques