Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsIts not often I get to revisit locations to have anotehr crack at sunrise or sunset, I usually prefer to try and have a crack at a different location, keeps the interest up. However I did visit two locations, both which I have been to before, I doon't necessarily think I got better pictures this time round, but got teh different conditions which gave different opportunities and different effects - its almost like visiting a fresh location
Critique, good bad or fugly always welcome. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsIs this that Bungan (SP?) place you were at once before? if so I think I preferred one of your shots from last time over these.
I like the second here except for that cloud on the left - normally I like cloud - but in this instance my first impression was that there was no separation on the left (leading to a kind of abnormal wave/water look on the left - kinda hard to explain sorry ). I almost reckon you could crop off the right inch or so of the last image (to get rid of the tree in silhouette) - just seems a little heavy on the right? D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsI love the flat water in #2, big ND action here?
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsI like the first the best although would prefer calmer seas to give the rocks greater prominence and scale. Obviously your divine powers were off that day?
The third would be improved without the objects in the water at the left although doubt you could do much with that. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting Locations#2 has very nice compo. The tones are not as strong as your previous ones. Do you have on with more prominent foreground with nice textured rock etc.
#3 is also nicely composed. The lighting is nicer here. The tones are good. What more can you ask for? #2 and #3 the lighting is flat ; the gods were against you. You have done well with the bland skies you were given.
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsI like the first and then the last Gerry. The second is also great.
I have not managed anything like these so that may explain the limited critique. I would certainly consider something like the first for a wall. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting Locations
ahh yes, Dunbogan - no more jokes about the people that live at Dunbogan either...or else I will not get to that beach again..damn angry locals.
I sorta understand here
yeah this image needs some refining, I have reworked it. thoughts, better? I really liek this shot as a image but feel it is just not there yet.
I probably could have achieved that since there was good variation in the wave action, there were plenty of sets when the water in this little bay was nice and calm - I did go into this shot with the sole intention of promoting the rock in the foreground, however as you mentioned there is certainly room to improvve there!
nah, this was just polarizer and GND, however it was pre-dawn so it was pretty dark.
thanks colin! FYI, here is a image that shows the little bay gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting Locations
I still reckon it might look better with the left bit (inch) chopped off and only have the log coming out of the left of the frame?
I actually quite like that image on it's own D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Sunset and Sunrise- Revisting LocationsThe images with the rock foreground aren't as strong as your first one.
How about B&W to accentuate the tones rather than the colors?
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|