On the 7th day, he createdModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
On the 7th day, he createdthe foreground.
I sensed a nice sunset yesterday and started heading to Bare Island but thought I'd check out Botany bay instead. I didn't have spots in mind (didn't know any) so took the first spot I could find as time was running out. In this spot, there was absolutely no foreground interest. There were some birds but they were expert at keeping along distance away.... So I had to create my own foreground in these. Please C&C away. PS: I think I will need to buy a fishing rod and a hat perhaps.....
Re: On the 7th day, he createdGreat spot with the sandbar leading you in to the shot. I like the footprints as the foregound interest in #2.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: On the 7th day, he createdSuren
The footprints are a vital element in your image. A great example of how to avoid an empty foreground. Regards
Matt. K
Re: On the 7th day, he createdWhat Matt said... Good work Surenj
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Re: On the 7th day, he created#2 is definitely the better of the images. The footprints really help!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: On the 7th day, he createdPerhaps take the sky from the first and add to the footprints of the second. The sky makes it look like you used an ultra wide (I presume however you didn't)?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: On the 7th day, he created
I was thinking it was definitely an ultra wide...sky, very distant horizon and those footsteps recede in size very quickly... Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: On the 7th day, he createdHey Suren, the first needs a bit more love in the light department imo, there is some good detail there which could well be subtly brought out to compliment the scene.
The second is a classic cliche (in a good way) way to produce a interesting foreground when there is little love from a beach. However with footprints, I reckon they need to carefully placed, in this case they need to be heading away from the camera rather than towards? its a bit hard to see their direction. Anyway regarding teh first image, here a quick edit that imo, gives it that extra bit of pop - with a ghosty suren in frame. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|