Little house on the ... paddock

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ozimax on Tue May 24, 2011 11:10 am

Robyn and I were driving through the Northern Tablelands last Saturday, enroute to dusty Tamworth. I spotted this small house next to the railway line, not far from Uralla. I just had to stop and take some photos. Thankfully I had my 5D and tripod at hand.

There is something unusual about this house. I wonder if anyone can spot it?

Image
House1 by Ozimax, on Flickr
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby Remorhaz on Tue May 24, 2011 11:27 am

Chimney smack in the middle?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue May 24, 2011 11:33 am

I like the image, but feel it would be improved if it were looking into the image rather than out of it. Perhaps clone out the telegraph pole while you are at it.

As for the something odd...
1. The chimney comes out of the peak of the roof. That puts the fireplace in the centre of the the house. Not that odd, but it is unusual. In fact it makes good sense in that cold climate - my brother in law lives just a few km away from there and I KNOW how cold it gets.
2. The house looks to be square. Two rooms by two. This is quite odd. There don't even appear to be any add ons
3. It looks as though it is built on a concrete slab. This is exceedingly odd for a house of this apparent vintage.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ozimax on Tue May 24, 2011 2:50 pm

Rodney and Greg, thanks for the comments. As for the unusual thing, close but no bouquet. You have to look very closely at a certain feature of the building.

And yes, Uralla is freezing in the winter, although last Saturday it was magnificent. We used to live in Armidale when we were very small kids and I have an old super-8 movie of the region, blanketed, no, completely covered, in deep snow. Those were the days.

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby biggerry on Tue May 24, 2011 3:11 pm

lol, Uralla - blink and you will miss it...

I used to live in sunny armidale many years ago, great town and spent many a day in Uralla.

With regard to the picture, why so much space on the left side? it feels like this space should be on the other side!

There is also some haloing in teh clouds - PP effect?, did you use a polariser as well?
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ozimax on Tue May 24, 2011 3:18 pm

biggerry wrote:With regard to the picture, why so much space on the left side? it feels like this space should be on the other side! There is also some haloing in teh clouds - PP effect?, did you use a polariser as well?


Yes, used a polarizer. As for the space, to the right of the house was all sorts of junk, rail lines, stop signs etc. It was quite difficult to frame the shot. I agree it would have been easier on the eye had it been on the left with empty space to the right of frame.

I will give a clue. The unusual thing has something to do with the windows.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ATJ on Tue May 24, 2011 3:30 pm

Is it that the windows look like they don't open? They sort of look like sash windows but there are only 4 panes and there should be 8 - 4 for the top and 4 for the bottom.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ozimax on Tue May 24, 2011 3:37 pm

ATJ wrote:Is it that the windows look like they don't open?


Andrew you are very, very close.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ATJ on Tue May 24, 2011 3:43 pm

They aren't windows at all? If that is the case, it is difficult to tell from the photo but you know because you were there.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby ozimax on Tue May 24, 2011 4:14 pm

ATJ wrote:They aren't windows at all? If that is the case, it is difficult to tell from the photo but you know because you were there.


You are exactly right, and you win the prize Andrew. The windows are not actually windows. They were just painted on timber, as was the door. I suppose it's one way to stop vandalism.

Would you believe, the prize is a brand new Canon 1D MkIV and a dozen L lenses? You wouldn't believe that?
How about a 70 year old box brownie? No?
A shoe box with a pin hole in it?

In any case, congratulations.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue May 24, 2011 6:06 pm

That would be...
Boobie Prize: a brand new Canon 1D MkIV and a dozen L lenses? If I had them I would want to get rid of them too!
2nd Prize: 70 year old box brownie? At least it has curiosity value
1st Prize: A shoe box with a pin hole in it? At last a decent(ish) camera on offer. Compared to the other two anyways.

:twisted: :biglaugh:
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Little house on the ... paddock

Postby surenj on Tue May 24, 2011 9:00 pm

:shock:

ozimax wrote: The windows are not actually windows. They were just painted on timber, as was the door.

This is quite impossible to tell when I look at this picture. Were the 'timbre' jutting out of the structure. The reason for asking is that the shadows on the windows on the right are quite believable. The shadows on the left side windows are obscured.

Mr Darcy wrote:At last a decent(ish) camera on offer

Definitely agree especially above ISO12800. :wink:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques