| Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
 
		
			Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
		
	 
		
		
			Forum rulesPlease note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
 
 Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
 
 Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
 
 Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Fri May 20, 2011 11:10 pm
 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Matt. K on Sun May 22, 2011 12:09 am
 GerryOne of our earlier, very active members, whose avatar was birddog flew these things during the Vietnam war. His callsign was birddog 114.
 Regards
 Matt. K
 
			
				 Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM Posts: 9981Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pmLocation: North Nowra 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Sun May 22, 2011 12:54 am
 These are some interesting images Gerry. I can see why you would like this craft. I do like the vintage processing of this set, but do you have some unprocessed images to share/compare? CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by colin_12 on Sun May 22, 2011 11:14 am
 Looking at the artificial horizon, is your hanger on that much of a slope?      I don't think you would want to fly it in the dark or fog if it not your hanger. Cool pics, I also like the treatment on these.Regards ColinCameras, lenses and a lust for life
 
			
				 colin_12
Senior Member Posts: 1853Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pmLocation: Hazelbrook 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by stetner on Sun May 22, 2011 8:38 pm
 Matt. K wrote:GerryOne of our earlier, very active members, whose avatar was birddog flew these things during the Vietnam war. His callsign was birddog 114.
 Yep, and if you ever see him, tell him he still owes me $1500.00  So many toys, so little time.... 
			
				 stetner
Member Posts: 183Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pmLocation: Wynnum West, Brisbane 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Matt. K on Sun May 22, 2011 9:50 pm
 Stetner Get in the queue      .Regards
 Matt. K
 
			
				 Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM Posts: 9981Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pmLocation: North Nowra 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by aim54x on Sun May 22, 2011 10:36 pm
 colin_12 wrote:Looking at the artificial horizon, is your hanger on that much of a slope?      I don't think you would want to fly it in the dark or fog if it not your hanger. Cool pics, I also like the treatment on these.
 Great spotting Colin. I really do hope that there is something wrong with that artificial horizon and it is there for Gerry to attend to it...CameronNikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project 
			
				 aim54x
Senior Member Posts: 7305Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pmLocation: Penshurst, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Sun May 22, 2011 11:09 pm
 aim54x wrote:colin_12 wrote:Looking at the artificial horizon, is your hanger on that much of a slope?      I don't think you would want to fly it in the dark or fog if it not your hanger. Cool pics, I also like the treatment on these.
 Great spotting Colin. I really do hope that there is something wrong with that artificial horizon and it is there for Gerry to attend to it...
 Attitude Indicator is all good, they always look 'wonky' when they are not 'erect' - basically there is a little gyro inside that is spun up by an electrical motor or by a vacuum air system... 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by ozimax on Mon May 23, 2011 11:18 am
 biggerry wrote:Attitude Indicator is all good, 
 My wife reckons I need an attitude indicator...  President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
 
			
				 ozimax
Senior Member Posts: 5289Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 amLocation: Coffs Harbour, NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Mon May 23, 2011 11:24 am
 Gerry, these have a superb mood to them. Compos on #1 and #2 are especially strong as there is not much clutter. The processing is perfect I reckon. I can't tell whether you have D lighted or photomatixed. I am favouring D lighted...     stetner wrote:Yep, and if you ever see him, tell him he still owes me $1500.00 
 Matt. K wrote:Get in the queue .
  
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Mon May 23, 2011 11:39 am
 this was never gonna be on topic so anyway...    ozimax wrote:My wife reckons I need an attitude indicator... 
 maybe cause its not erect enough    googles gonna love this thread  
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Mon May 23, 2011 10:44 pm
 aim54x wrote:These are some interesting images Gerry. I can see why you would like this craft. I do like the vintage processing of this set, but do you have some unprocessed images to share/compare?
 I only took several images so my selection is a bit thin, I only had a few minutes to spare at the time..    stetner wrote:Matt. K wrote:GerryOne of our earlier, very active members, whose avatar was birddog flew these things during the Vietnam war. His callsign was birddog 114.
 Yep, and if you ever see him, tell him he still owes me $1500.00  
 I had a peruse thru some of teh old threads - quite interestign reading and quite frankly if I had known the history of this place and digitalslr i would have steered so damn clear of the place! its hard to believe this guy somehow ripped people off with so much money - given his his heavy involvement tracking him down should not have been a problem. surenj wrote:Gerry, these have a superb mood to them. Compos on #1 and #2 are especially strong as there is not much clutter.
 The processing is perfect I reckon. I can't tell whether you have D lighted or photomatixed. I am favouring D lighted...
 cheers suren - the PP is a little batch script I have generated and can tweak for each image its applied too, quite nice really if I do say so myself   
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Thu May 26, 2011 8:53 pm
 aim54x wrote:but do you have some unprocessed images to share/compare?
 heres one from another quick session with this plane - notice the difference... lets see you strobist gurus reverse engineer the lighting on this one      
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Thu May 26, 2011 10:23 pm
 This plane is lit with two overhead lights attached to the ceiling. The one from the left upper is much stronger(or closer to plane) than the right upper.
 You switched off all other lights in the room. You handheld this shot. There was no flash.
 
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Sun May 29, 2011 11:09 pm
 surenj wrote:This plane is lit with two overhead lights attached to the ceiling. The one from the left upper is much stronger(or closer to plane) than the right upper.
 You switched off all other lights in the room. You handheld this shot. There was no flash.
 i shoulda stripped the exif...     damned reverse engineers... 4 lights all in a row, all teh same height and intensity 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by surenj on Sun May 29, 2011 11:15 pm
 biggerry wrote:4 lights all in a row, all teh same height and intensity
 Hard to believe unless the shadows lie...     Tis too hard to see 4 shadows I guess. biggerry wrote:i shoulda stripped the exif... damned reverse engineers...
    I was about to believe that you had one light on and was popping ya flash with a ladder until I saw the 1/20th....    
			
				 surenj
Senior Member Posts: 7197Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pmLocation: Artarmon NSW 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Mr Darcy on Tue May 31, 2011 6:40 pm
 I see three lights from the shadows. The fourth may be at the rear. GregIt's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
 
			
				 Mr Darcy
Senior Member Posts: 3414Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pmLocation: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by Ant on Tue May 31, 2011 8:30 pm
 biggerry wrote:aim54x wrote:colin_12 wrote:Looking at the artificial horizon, is your hanger on that much of a slope?      I don't think you would want to fly it in the dark or fog if it not your hanger. Cool pics, I also like the treatment on these.
 Great spotting Colin. I really do hope that there is something wrong with that artificial horizon and it is there for Gerry to attend to it...
 Attitude Indicator is all good, they always look 'wonky' when they are not 'erect' - basically there is a little gyro inside that is spun up by an electrical motor or by a vacuum air system...
 Everytime I see one of your threads it makes me want to get back in an aircraft... Warm up checks... gyro upright and stable...D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600 
			
				 Ant
Member Posts: 304Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pmLocation: Lyndhurst, Melbourne
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Tue May 31, 2011 9:07 pm
 surenj wrote:Hard to believe unless the shadows lie... Tis too hard to see 4 shadows I guess.
 Mr Darcy wrote:I see three lights from the shadows. The fourth may be at the rear.
 yeah its hard to tell there is an extra two lights - basically they are pretty directional lights so they act like diffused spot lights looking straight down, hence the outer two probably provide very little effect other than a bit of spill. surenj wrote: I was about to believe that you had one light on and was popping ya flash with a ladder until I saw the 1/20th.... 
 lol.. Ant wrote:Everytime I see one of your threads it makes me want to get back in an aircraft...Warm up checks... gyro upright and stable...
 haha..well i better not post the pictures of the cessna caravan i was in the other day then    
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! on Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:17 pm
 Hey it's got tundra tyres on it now!
 Man with a turbine this thing would be a nut to fly
 Canon EOS 40DCanon EOS 400D
 50mm 1.8 EF
 
			
				 !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~!
Member Posts: 437Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:19 amLocation: Essendon - MELBOURNE 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:36 pm
 !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! wrote:Hey it's got tundra tyres on it now!
 Man with a turbine this thing would be a nut to fly
 yep, thats the one, or commonly known as bushman tyres, bit hard to miss since they look like freakin' rubber ferris wheels on the aircraft. One thing that would be interesting is to see how the short field t/o performance is with a turbine, google videos of piper cubs with bushman tyres and be prepared to be amazed! 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! on Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:28 pm
 biggerry wrote:!~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! wrote:Hey it's got tundra tyres on it now!
 Man with a turbine this thing would be a nut to fly
 yep, thats the one, or commonly known as bushman tyres, bit hard to miss since they look like freakin' rubber ferris wheels on the aircraft. One thing that would be interesting is to see how the short field t/o performance is with a turbine, google videos of piper cubs with bushman tyres and be prepared to be amazed!
 Yup I have the DVD 'Big rocks Long Props' it's AWESOME!Canon EOS 40DCanon EOS 400D
 50mm 1.8 EF
 
			
				 !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~!
Member Posts: 437Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:19 amLocation: Essendon - MELBOURNE 
 
		
		
			
			
			 by biggerry on Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:07 am
 !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! wrote:biggerry wrote:!~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! wrote:Hey it's got tundra tyres on it now!
 Man with a turbine this thing would be a nut to fly
 yep, thats the one, or commonly known as bushman tyres, bit hard to miss since they look like freakin' rubber ferris wheels on the aircraft. One thing that would be interesting is to see how the short field t/o performance is with a turbine, google videos of piper cubs with bushman tyres and be prepared to be amazed!
 Yup I have the DVD 'Big rocks Long Props' it's AWESOME!
 your a bad man (that burnt alot time for me    )... that sh$t they do with skiis is just plain wrong but so beautiful... 
			
				 biggerry
Senior Member Posts: 5930Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 amLocation: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
				
			 
 
 Return to Image Reviews and Critiques |