My 2.38 Seconds

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

My 2.38 Seconds

Postby dviv on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:09 am

Hi all,

Not sure how many have been watching "the Block" but one of my photos was printed on canvas and hung in the winning room on Sunday just gone.

You can view the room here: http://homes.ninemsn.com.au/theblock/rooms-masterbedroom/8275082/polly-and-waz-master-bedroom-ensuite

Have a great day!

David
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby the foto fanatic on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:17 am

Hey - congrats!

Do you have the image for sale somewhere? How did the contestants obtain it?
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby gstark on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:23 am

the foto fanatic wrote:Hey - congrats!


Indeed.

How did the contestants obtain it?


Be careful what you ask. Dave's image was probably the only item of high quality that will have been on the show throughout its whole run thus far, and that's a situation that's unlikely to change anytime soon.

:biglaugh:
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby dviv on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:45 am

Thanks guys,

I happen to know one of the contestants personally and they asked me for a specific style of picture. Luckily I had taken lots of shots in Melbourne over the last couple of years and only had to choose and appropriate one, convert to B&W and get it printed/delivered.

gstark wrote:Be careful what you ask. Dave's image was probably the only item of high quality that will have been on the show throughout its whole run thus far, and that's a situation that's unlikely to change anytime soon.

:biglaugh:

You'd probably be surprised. I visited the house during filming and it was pretty well done. The difference this year being that the couples are not doing the structural work, they are mainly doing painting and decorating and coordinating the trades.
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby gstark on Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:27 pm

dviv wrote:You'd probably be surprised.


No. I expect the show to be crap, and from what I've seen, I'm totally unsurprised.

I've had the misfortune to have the tv on while this has been going to air. With all due respect to your friends, what a total waste of airtime. The show is absolute mindless crap of the lowest possible order. Why do most of the females have voices that sound like they're inarticulate frogs?

The only thing that surprises me is that some people actually seem to watch this sort of rubbish, and seem to find it entertaining.

Sorry. No I'm not.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby dviv on Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:10 pm

gstark wrote:
dviv wrote:You'd probably be surprised.


No. I expect the show to be crap, and from what I've seen, I'm totally unsurprised.

I've had the misfortune to have the tv on while this has been going to air. With all due respect to your friends, what a total waste of airtime. The show is absolute mindless crap of the lowest possible order. Why do most of the females have voices that sound like they're inarticulate frogs?

The only thing that surprises me is that some people actually seem to watch this sort of rubbish, and seem to find it entertaining.

Sorry. No I'm not.
 LOL

I meant you'd be surprised at the quality of the houses, not the show :nono:

As far as the show goes..... no comment :mrgreen:
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:01 pm

dviv wrote:LOL

I meant you'd be surprised at the quality of the houses, not the show

As far as the show goes..... no comment
 LOL, well the quality of the picture isn't in question its great, and I like that they tied the local view into the wall art.

Not many of us can say out photos have been on national television :) well done. :up:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby surenj on Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:34 pm

Congrats Dave! Looks like a nice canvas print. Where did you get it done?
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby Remorhaz on Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:13 pm

Ahh congrats - so you were the photographer friend they spoke of...
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:30 pm

The tree??? I like that image.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby aim54x on Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:11 pm

Congrats!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby dviv on Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:43 am

Thanks guys - appreciate it.

Matt. K wrote:The tree??? I like that image.


Nope - Mine was the Melbourne cityscape with the yarra in the foreground. The tree was a print used on a different night.

Remorhaz wrote:Ahh congrats - so you were the photographer friend they spoke of...


Yup :cheers:

surenj wrote:Congrats Dave! Looks like a nice canvas print. Where did you get it done?


Photo Canvas Prints in Melbourne :cheers:
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby Elver on Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:32 am

Great work, Dave! Well done. Nice comments about it by the show's judges too. You must be very happy.
EOS 5D MkII, 70-200mm f/2.8LIS, 24-70mm f/2.8LIS, 50mm f/1.2, 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 IS, 580EX II
Elver
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: Granville, NSW

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby colin_12 on Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:37 am

Nice one Dave. It featured more in the segment than the actual view, or any other part of the room. :up:
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: My 2.38 Seconds

Postby dviv on Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:27 am

Thanks Colins! :mrgreen:

I visited the house on the weekend and am really happy with the result.

It just goes to show that the best photos are not always the "right" one. That particular shot was pretty dodgy but cleaned up and converted to B&W it came up a treat - and matched the rest of the room which was the most important thing.
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney


Return to General Discussion