Nice glowModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Nice glowCan I note that the horizons need a bit of a bump...and I would also increase the contrast a bit so you get solid silhouette....very nicely done though
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Nice glowNow that is a bit different. Nice work.
I would also like to see it with a bit more contrast to improve the silhouette. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Nice glowAnd if you're using something like Lightroom I'd probably apply the contrast only to the bottom part of the image (water and below) (using the gradient tool) so that you don't end up with banding in the sky?
Did you add the vignette at the top or is that a la naturale? D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Nice glowVery nice stuff. I do agree, the 70-200mm focal length is great for landscapes.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Nice glowThanks all for your comments.
This is probably because of the filter sitting on the horizon line.
This is the natural vignetting from the 70-200.
I used quite a lot on my last trip for landscape, more than the 17-35. I'll go back to these and see what more contrast will do.
Re: Nice glowI think the first is the stronger because of the position of the paddler but think a a fairly heavy pano crop would be nice. the colour is amazing.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|