Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Mr Darcy on Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:05 pm
I have finally started posting my trip photos hereThis is one of the photos there: I got the following comment there Biggerry wrote: I know its not a critique area, however cropping a fraction off teh sky would make this a winner in my books
Now this is a long way from my favourite image, in fact I very nearly binned it, but as I have a lot of respect for BG, I thought I would try his suggestion out. Here are two attempts. Any opinions? With just a little haircut: And with all the laminar cloud trimmed off: Mind you, I am also inclined to clone out that patch of grey in the middle of the main cloud. I haven't as I am just exploring a single concept here.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-
Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by Big V on Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:56 pm
The first edit has a little more drama in the sky and adds to the overall scene more than the second edit...
Canon
-
Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
by biggerry on Wed Aug 17, 2011 10:09 pm
Mr Darcy wrote:Now this is a long way from my favourite image, in fact I very nearly binned it, but as I have a lot of respect for BG
sucker... Mr Darcy wrote:, I thought I would try his suggestion out. Here are two attempts. Any opinions?
OK, the reason I like this image is that thru all its shortcomings from a technical stand point the composition and elements just simply work well. Its a great example of a shot where the composition, framing and elements override any other aspect, i think of it like starting with a clean white canvas - that is a good composition/framing/elements, everyhting else after that falls into place and is easy. Whereas images which do not have strong compositions or are missing balancing elements or anchor points or focus points etc are like starting with a dirty brown canvas, they need alotta luvin to get something half decent. So enough babble, onto your versions, irrespective of what crop you choose, if any, you need to address the sharpness first, as mentioned it was taken from a window of a car so its gonna be a bit blurry, some tweakage on teh contrast levels and large radius unsharp mask (applied selectively) can bring this back to a an acceptable sharpness stand point imo. In terms of the cropping, now that I see your pano style, i am not convinced that would be the right way to go if you were to crop it, i would maintain the 6*4 ratio and simply balance the sky with the rest of the image. heres one i prepared earlier - as usual let me know if you want it removed.
-
biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by aim54x on Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:26 pm
Im with Gerry on the sharpness/contrast boost....I am still undecided about what crop to take...but can I point out that the LHS can be bumped upwards a notch!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-
aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by Murray Foote on Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:18 am
I think I prefer it the way it is originally. I don't think cropping helps and because it's not entirely sharp, I don't think the contrast/ saturation increase helps either - or at least not as shown. Perhaps really subtle changes that treated sky, hills and foreground separately.
-
Murray Foote
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
- Location: Ainslie, Canberra
by zafra52 on Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:50 pm
I think I like the orignal best, also.
-
zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4827
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by gstark on Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:48 pm
Me too.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-
gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22918
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Matt. K on Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:04 pm
Greg This is a fine image and one that would work best if you dropped the colours out and went B&W. The colours are a bit tepid and contribute nothing to the excellent composition and wonderful subject matter. I like the image a great deal and think it is one of the best you have posted.
Matt. K
Regards
Matt. K
-
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by Willy wombat on Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:12 am
I love the subject material. Great place and nicely composed.
-
Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
by PiroStitch on Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:26 am
Prefer the original without the cropping and I agree that it would be work even better as a b&w conversion. Sublime photos don't have to be technically correct. That's what science and technology is for, not art
-
PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Mr Darcy on Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:22 am
PiroStitch wrote: That's what science and technology is for, not art
And that about sums me up. Sigh. Wannabe artist though. I have to say I prefer the original crop too. That's why I haven't reposted yet. Not to mention BG's other thread where the consensus seems to be that too much reposting is worse than none at all. I will try the BW though. I rarely think of that. Despite, or perhaps because, I am colourblind. And post those attempts.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-
Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by biggerry on Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:16 pm
Mr Darcy wrote:PiroStitch wrote: That's what science and technology is for, not art
And that about sums me up. Sigh. Wannabe artist though. I have to say I prefer the original crop too. That's why I haven't reposted yet. Not to mention BG's other thread where the consensus seems to be that too much reposting is worse than none at all. I will try the BW though. I rarely think of that. Despite, or perhaps because, I am colourblind. And post those attempts.
at the very least Greg you have stimulated some discussion about your images and thats a plus in my book. I would not stress about reposting...
-
biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Mr Darcy on Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:43 pm
At long last, here are a couple of attempts at Monochrome conversion. Both are SilverEfexPro presets as I am too new at this program to venture into seat of pants mode yet. Opinons? Full Contrast & Structure: This one Is Film Noir 1 I quite like this but Pam does not. Incidentally, when I save in sFX and return to Lightroom, the picture shows the original colour version. The BW version only appears when I export the photo. Any suggestions on what I (or the program) is doing wrong? I tried rebuilding the preview to no avail.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-
Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by PiroStitch on Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:00 pm
Not a huge fan of the film noir version, it's overdone. The conversion with full contrast and structure works very well as it has a very historic feel about it. It's definitely worth printing large either on foam mount or canvas. When I do a conversion, I use the option Edit a Copy with LR Adjustments. Once complete, it automatically appears as b&w in my preview. Are you sure you're viewing the PSD file and not the RAW file in LR? I enabled image stacking when exporting for b&w conversion.
-
PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Matt. K on Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:58 pm
Those clouds are bloody spectacular!!
Regards
Matt. K
-
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by radar on Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:34 pm
That first B&W is great. Try a red filter in sFX. If the effect is too strong, try the yellow. This will enhance the contrast between sky and clouds. You have some very nice clouds there, so take full advantage of them
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
-
radar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
-
by biggerry on Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:46 pm
Mr Darcy wrote:At long last, here are a couple of attempts at Monochrome conversion. Both are SilverEfexPro presets as I am too new at this program to venture into seat of pants mode yet. Opinons?
BW version (first one) is looking good, its dialled up a bit too much for me, dropping back the contrast/effect would be good imo, the image seems to have lost some of its depth which is the only downer from my end.
-
biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|