Bull FighterModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bull FighterAs I was commenting on a picture a few days
ago in this forum, it occurred to me to do exactly what I was recommending and face the music and here it is:
Re: Bull FighterPurrrrrrrrfect
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Bull FighterArty. It has very good balanced elements and may look good printed on the right medium and hung in the right space. But in all honesty, I'm not sure.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Bull FighterThat shot does nothing for me, quite frankly the blur and more noticeably teh blur direction gives me motion sickness, that could be due to the 3 beers and the hour before hand of spinning around with a 2 yro but...
how to improve it? I dunno, someone with more of a artistic bone in their body than me well hopefully pipe in. What do you think of it zafra? gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Bull FighterGives me a bit of motion sickness as well. Do you have a picture with a little bit more definition to the subjects? I also think that perhaps a circular motion is more appropriate for these subjects to convey chaos rather than linear motion here.
Re: Bull FighterI like it very much. Conveys a sense of volatility and danger which is relevant to the activity.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Bull FighterI'm sorry, I tried cleaning my glasses. Three times.
Still does nothing for me. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Bull FighterI admire the attempt and think that the result is interesting.
I think that if you tried it again (difficult with this subject, I know!) slightly less blurring would make it much more involving. I don't know whether you achieved the blur with panning or shutter speed (maybe both) but if you were able to go easier on the panning or use a faster shutter speed the figures would be more distinct. As it is, it is very abstract, and that may have been your intention. If so, you would be pleased with the results. This is someone making a photograph rather that just shooting what is in front of them. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Bull FighterYeah sorry Zafra too much blur for me to - it's probably not blurry enough to be that overall arty soft blur (like a bokeh image) and too blurry to be that recognisable shot (i.e. if you didn't say what it was I'm not sure I would have got it). Suren's idea may have had some merit (rather than straight up and down movement).
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Bull FighterThank you friends for your time and comments. As I mentioned
before, the idea came to me after commenting in a member's picture so I wanted to put myself into his/her shoes and try to do to one of my pictures what I was advising, and I certainly got quite a variety of reactions from this audience and the 50 or more that visited my web page. Personally I got exactly the effect I was after. The subject itself is not to everybody's taste so I thought the added motion blur turning it into an impresionistic image and would be more palatable, if that is the right word. Here is the original out of the camera no resizing or anything done to it for accidentally I changed the camera setting and many of my pictures were taken at very low resolution.
Re: Bull FighterI think this would work better if it was a shot from the side of the matador and the bull. The current angle and perspective doesn't work with what was being attempted.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Bull Fighteragree the eye contact issue.
Re: Bull FighterOne of the many issues I decided to turn
the picture into the above image. Thanks for the comments.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|