Candid PeopleModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Candid PeopleGiven my location, on top of a mountain, we often have people launching themselves off the top of the mountain with a flimsy bit of material overhead to return them back to ground. While I did take some images of the paragliders here are a couple of shots of people that turned up to watch the spectacle.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Candid PeopleFor me the strongest of these is the first. The visible hang glider gives a reason for the people to be looking off camera in this shot. With the second while they are clearly looking at something, their gaze takes me away from the photo so it loses impact. The third is saved a little by its voyeuristic tendency, but still lacks somewhat. PS you have a nice hill
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Candid People
Summed up adequately. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Candid People
Ditto g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Candid PeopleFirst one is an excellent "photojournalistic" image. Great stuff.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Candid People
My thoughts exactly, its good to get thought of others, thanks for the feedback. In the first image I was shooting with my 70-200 @ 70mm. I would like to have got a wider view but at 70mm I was struggling due to surrounding confines. The image is obviously from a sligthly wider view but there where other people included along side the two gents which distracted from the overall feel which has been acheived with the square crop. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Candid PeopleI tend to agree with the above. The first
pictures tells a story; the others don't.
Re: Candid PeopleI think Greg has nailed this one!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|