Three pano's - one needed

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Three pano's - one needed

Postby stubbsy on Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:01 pm

I have a problem and need some feedback. I'm putting together an Argentina & Chile photo book and have 3 pano shots taken in San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. Obviously 3 similar shots in a book won't work so I need to choose one. Below are my final three after I've done some culling. Clicking them should show each at a reasonable size. Which one would you choose?

Image

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby aim54x on Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:15 pm

That is a tough choice.....I like them all....sorry I am not helping
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby Marvin on Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:22 pm

I prefer numbers 2 or 3. I can't even explain why because I love mountains. At first glance, I thought number 3 and then, when I clicked, I preferred no 2.
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby norwest on Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:39 pm

#3 for it's simplicity but #2 overall.
norwest
Member
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby biggerry on Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:03 pm

easy.
1 followed by 2.

check your sky for banding (horizontal) could just be my end though.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby Geoff M on Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:29 pm

#1 holds my attention, compositionally better IMHO - too much sky in 2 & 3.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby Remorhaz on Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:00 am

#2
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby Mr Darcy on Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:17 am

I would choose #2 It does a good job of showing the lakes as well as showing the mountains going from middle distance right back into the far distance. It is a vista that I can travel around (and wish that I did) Maybe lose a little sky though.

#1 just shows the mountains. It also has some pano stitching issues. i.e. the vertical bands in the sky abov the white mountain

#3 just shows the lakes and I find it doesn't hold my interest as long as the others. Less going on. And way too much sky.

Will #1 & #2 stitch together. It looks like they might.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby the foto fanatic on Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:32 am

I prefer #2. It seems more aesthetically pleasing than the others.

There is a nice balance of forest, lake and snow-capped mountains.

It also looks a tad sharper to me.

Lovely images...
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby ATJ on Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:59 pm

#2 for me. I like the idea of having the highest mountains to one side rather than in the middle.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby Steffen on Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:35 pm

I too like #2 best. The way the foreground features lead into the image gives it great depth.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby zafra52 on Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:52 pm

I prefer number 2, as well. Maybe because
it looks a more balanced feel about it than
the other two.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby stubbsy on Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:04 pm

Thank you one and all. I had a slight preference for #2 myself so the majority has convinced me (baaaa) and I will use that one. Greg - I thought of stitching #1 and #2 together since that may work (they were taken from the same basic spot, but it would be a bloody wide pano!
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Three pano's - one needed

Postby surenj on Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:28 am

#2 would be nice if you can include a little bit to complete that lake on the lower right.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques