Three pano's - one neededModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Three pano's - one neededI have a problem and need some feedback. I'm putting together an Argentina & Chile photo book and have 3 pano shots taken in San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. Obviously 3 similar shots in a book won't work so I need to choose one. Below are my final three after I've done some culling. Clicking them should show each at a reasonable size. Which one would you choose?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Three pano's - one neededThat is a tough choice.....I like them all....sorry I am not helping
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Three pano's - one neededI prefer numbers 2 or 3. I can't even explain why because I love mountains. At first glance, I thought number 3 and then, when I clicked, I preferred no 2.
Nikon D7000
Re: Three pano's - one needed#3 for it's simplicity but #2 overall.
Re: Three pano's - one neededeasy.
1 followed by 2. check your sky for banding (horizontal) could just be my end though. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Three pano's - one needed#1 holds my attention, compositionally better IMHO - too much sky in 2 & 3.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Three pano's - one needed#2
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Three pano's - one neededI would choose #2 It does a good job of showing the lakes as well as showing the mountains going from middle distance right back into the far distance. It is a vista that I can travel around (and wish that I did) Maybe lose a little sky though.
#1 just shows the mountains. It also has some pano stitching issues. i.e. the vertical bands in the sky abov the white mountain #3 just shows the lakes and I find it doesn't hold my interest as long as the others. Less going on. And way too much sky. Will #1 & #2 stitch together. It looks like they might. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Three pano's - one neededI prefer #2. It seems more aesthetically pleasing than the others.
There is a nice balance of forest, lake and snow-capped mountains. It also looks a tad sharper to me. Lovely images... TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Three pano's - one needed#2 for me. I like the idea of having the highest mountains to one side rather than in the middle.
Re: Three pano's - one neededI too like #2 best. The way the foreground features lead into the image gives it great depth.
Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Re: Three pano's - one neededI prefer number 2, as well. Maybe because
it looks a more balanced feel about it than the other two.
Re: Three pano's - one neededThank you one and all. I had a slight preference for #2 myself so the majority has convinced me (baaaa) and I will use that one. Greg - I thought of stitching #1 and #2 together since that may work (they were taken from the same basic spot, but it would be a bloody wide pano!
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Three pano's - one needed#2 would be nice if you can include a little bit to complete that lake on the lower right.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|