Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by chrisk on Fri Nov 25, 2011 11:57 am
you must be MENTAL !! despite the rain and getting drenched, (note to all, never buy my d700 !!), had great fun at the zoo seeing the cubs and they went ballistic, (after 3 hrs of sleeping). it pays to be patient. apologies but i am going to post 6 images so i don't create another cub thread. i am also proud to say that i conquered photographers disease. at one point they were going so psycho playing and i could see all of these killer shots and started to feel myself getting anxious ! so i caught myself, put the camera down and just sat there enjoying the show. it was wonderful. right up against the glass and stuck with the 105VR on the d5100. the clarity of the shot stunned me athough i do wish it was the 60mm !  play time  calling the other cubs  look at those paws !!  2 of the 3 cubs. not sure which.  protective mum  thanks for looking. i have loads and loads of shots and will upload the lot to smugmug when i get the chance if anyone is interested. gerry...would be interested to know what time you took your shots with the wb issues. anything i shot after 1130 required a wb adjustment as the sun streamed in thru the foliage basically onto the viewing glass giving a greeny tint to everything and significantly degrading the contrast. anything i shot earlier in the day, around the 930-1030 mark, the wb was spot on and the photos are SOOC. good learning experience for me there for when i head back.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:39 pm
SHEESH! I have seen lots of tiger cub pictures across the forums in the last couple of weeks and there are some absolute stunners, these are no exception, these are great Chris. The third one should be cropped portrait, that yawn/growl whatever is very nice and should be accentuated! The second last one, they looked mirrored, this is also very very nice. top shelf. Rooz wrote:gerry...would be interested to know what time you took your shots with the wb issues. anything i shot after 1130 required a wb adjustment as the sun streamed in thru the foliage basically onto the viewing glass giving a greeny tint to everything and significantly degrading the contrast. anything i shot earlier in the day, around the 930-1030 mark, the wb was spot on and the photos are SOOC. good learning experience for me there for when i head back.
from memory I was there around 11:30-12...I would have loved to get there earlier but my timing was dictated by a 2 yro (no guesses for who wears the pants in our household now  ) That is very interesting about the WB and I guess not too surprising, the morning light would be softer, hence any negative effect of the foliage/shadows/reflections etc would be minimised. Were you right up against the glass for all these? lens square to the glass? I think my issue is that I was up to a couple of metres away from the glass (due to the crowd) and often at a 30-60 degree angle with the glass.. I would love to go back again and get there early and hence have the op to move around and try and get some shots with good eye contact, the shots where they look right down the barrel are absolute killers I reckon. I assume these are with your 300 f2.8? (excluding the first)? no teleconv.?
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:30 pm
biggerry wrote:Were you right up against the glass for all these? lens square to the glass? I think my issue is that I was up to a couple of metres away from the glass (due to the crowd) and often at a 30-60 degree angle with the glass...
yes, right up against the glass for the lot. lens hood resting against the glass. very small crowd cos it was such a crap day so i was ok and most people are pretty cool as long as you arent a hog. i'll post up some SOOC shots from the morning and afternoon to give you an indication of the vast difference. my morning shots need zero processing. all of these needed a colour adjust, which i didnt do a great job of anyway. lol I would love to go back again and get there early and hence have the op to move around and try and get some shots with good eye contact, the shots where they look right down the barrel are absolute killers I reckon.
i will post a few more in a different thread later of the adult cats, male and female, with direct eye contact. it makes yiur heart skip a beat looking thru the viewfinder ! I assume these are with your 300 f2.8? (excluding the first)? no teleconv.?
absolutely, and no tc this time round. apart from the fat boy, this is the best lens ive ever used in my life. i took 450 shots in pretty ordinary light at times and i reckon the hit rate is over 75% bang on focus. that has nothing to do with me, that's just the calibre of this lens. its astonishing. in fact for a rank amateur like me using a long lens to get that keeper rate is testament to how good it really is.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Steffen on Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:30 pm
Wow, sell them to the zoo, especially no 5!
Cheers Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
-

Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by aim54x on Fri Nov 25, 2011 7:44 pm
Great images, they look sensational. I am hoping to get out there again soon. So much work at the moment means I have had no time to get out there. Rooz wrote:note to all, never buy my d700 !!
I thought we were sworn not to do that after the last drenching incident!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Fri Nov 25, 2011 7:57 pm
aim54x wrote: I thought we were sworn not to do that after the last drenching incident!
just a friendly reminder. lol
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by aim54x on Fri Nov 25, 2011 7:58 pm
Rooz wrote:just a friendly reminder. lol
Thanks! 
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by norwest on Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:52 pm
#5 is a fantastic shot and I love it, but i think the dramatic message told by the last shot leaves it in it's wake. Great catch.
-
norwest
- Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW
by Geoff M on Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:59 am
Hey Chris these do not need critique. All are great shots but for me #5 takes the trophy - could be another POTW for you!
-

Geoff M
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
- Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.
by chrisk on Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:26 pm
so I was at Taronga on Friday with Lucas where we had a blast together, and when walking to the tiger cubs Lucas says casually...hey dad...there's your photo. I thought he meant take a photo so I look at him and say nah mate, that's just a picture, no need to take a picture of a picture. and in his normal 6yo boy way, shrugs his shoulders and we walk to the tigers. then as we're looking at the lions, (which have now inhabited the old tiger exhibit !), I start thinking...hold on a second...that's MY FUCKING PHOTO !! we walk back and I look at it...and I say...that's my photo whereby in his 6yo boy way he says I already knew that dad, I just told you and then proceeded to roll his eyes at me. I've had lots of animal shots published by Taronga on the web, calenders, mugs etc and some other zoos and in newspapers and none are really worth much of a mention but when I saw it this size as one of the main photos of the exhibit all backlit and mounted...I was a little taken aback to say the least. for a 12mp shot at iso800 blown up to 1.5mx1.5m it has held up remarkably well, great colour and loads of detail even at that size...pays to be shooting with great glass huh ? 20130426-IMG_0829 by .Chris.K, on Flickr just thought id share cos I was a little excited... 
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by aim54x on Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:56 am
Rooz wrote:so I was at Taronga on Friday with Lucas where we had a blast together, and when walking to the tiger cubs Lucas says casually...hey dad...there's your photo. I thought he meant take a photo so I look at him and say nah mate, that's just a picture, no need to take a picture of a picture. and in his normal 6yo boy way, shrugs his shoulders and we walk to the tigers. then as we're looking at the lions, (which have now inhabited the old tiger exhibit !), I start thinking...hold on a second...that's MY FUCKING PHOTO !!
we walk back and I look at it...and I say...that's my photo whereby in his 6yo boy way he says I already knew that dad, I just told you and then proceeded to roll his eyes at me.
I've had lots of animal shots published by Taronga on the web, calenders, mugs etc and some other zoos and in newspapers and none are really worth much of a mention but when I saw it this size as one of the main photos of the exhibit all backlit and mounted...I was a little taken aback to say the least. for a 12mp shot at iso800 blown up to 1.5mx1.5m it has held up remarkably well, great colour and loads of detail even at that size...pays to be shooting with great glass huh ?
...and they didn't tell you that they would be using your photo like that?
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:03 am
Nope. Was a total surprise.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by the foto fanatic on Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:07 am
It looks great!
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by Nikon boy on Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:20 am
Wow they are fantastic images ! well done
Nikon boy Norman
-

Nikon boy
- Member
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: California Gully
by ozimax on Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:57 am
They're all good Roozy, but 5/6 are cracking shots that would print well in any high end wildlife magazine in the world. Sensational. I can imagine nos 5 or 6 being printed on a massive canvas somewhere. If only I owned a house! Great work.
Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
by Matt. K on Wed May 01, 2013 7:35 pm
#5 is just amazing. Beautiful image worthy of a book cover.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by chrisk on Wed May 01, 2013 8:54 pm
Thanks guys.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|