Still Life

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Still Life

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:40 pm

Interested in your thoughts on the following image in its two variations.

Specifically, regarding treatment, subject matter and crop.

Image

Image

Let's try again.
Last edited by Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Still Life

Postby Matt. K on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:43 pm

Patrick
I can't see the images.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Still Life

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:53 pm

Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.


Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Still Life

Postby stubbsy on Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:57 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:
Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.


Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.


Patrick

Do you have external links set to No rather than Yes in the settings for that gallery?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Still Life

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:00 pm

stubbsy wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:
Matt. K wrote:Patrick
I can't see the images.


Ok, I don't really know why - no security settings on my gallery in Smugmug.


Patrick

Do you have external links set to No rather than Yes in the settings for that gallery?


No - set to "yes"
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Still Life

Postby stubbsy on Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:31 pm

OK I can see them now (but they're on flickr instead of SmugMug I see).

My comments - I prefer the landscape crop because I see the entire RHS pear. I think the lightin works well, BUT (and it's a big but) that brown blob in the background distracts me in both images.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Still Life

Postby surenj on Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:50 pm

I like the tones here but keen to see more of the pears.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Still Life

Postby Matt. K on Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:46 pm

I keep seeing boobs. Must be a trick photo. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Still Life

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:28 pm

Matt. K wrote:I keep seeing boobs. Must be a trick photo. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo? :biglaugh:

Thanks for the feedback, folks.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Still Life

Postby zafra52 on Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:57 pm

I prefer the secon, but the image doesn't come
accros to me a balanced. There is more edge to
the left than to the right.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Still Life

Postby gstark on Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:
Matt. K wrote:I keep seeing boobs. Must be a trick photo. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo?


I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Still Life

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:17 pm

gstark wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:
Matt. K wrote:I keep seeing boobs. Must be a trick photo. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo?


I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. :)


My brother had it on vinyl but I had the separate LPs "Piper at the Gates of Dawn" and "A Saucerful of Secrets". Oh, you weren't talking about Pink Floyd. :lol:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Still Life

Postby gstark on Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:30 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:
gstark wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:
Matt. K wrote:I keep seeing boobs. Must be a trick photo. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Matt, I think this may say more about you than the photo?


I suspect that he's saying that you have a nice pair. :)


My brother had it on vinyl but I had the separate LPs "Piper at the Gates of Dawn" and "A Saucerful of Secrets". Oh, you weren't talking about Pink Floyd. :lol:


Vinyl? Where's the silver halide version?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Still Life

Postby biggerry on Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:22 pm

here's my take, there is no point for the eye to focus on, nothign that pops out and locks the viewer to the image, that makes any/all of the PP treatment a moot point in my book.

Here's an alternative idea for teh second one, recover the highlights a bit, crop to get the one of teh brightest parts in the intersection of the thirds then push the existing PP further to remove more light detail in the image, hence leaving teh viewer with less to look at and more to think about.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques