A Box of Soft Light...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A Box of Soft Light...

Postby Remorhaz on Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:55 pm

We had our annual Christmas Carols at our local school recently and whilst there I took lots of photos of children and the various activities (playing instruments, singing, playing, etc) they were up to.

Around sunset/twilight I took my camera with the 50/1.4 onboard, my SB900 speedlight and a 24" speedlight softbox out onto the oval and let any of the kids who were interested have a play. I took the photos and the kids posed and others held the softbox and strobe which I remotely wirelessly triggered using the glory of Nikon's CLS.

I shot in manual and underexposed the sky (using a fast shutter speed - 1/200, 1/125, etc) and a wideish aperture for a soft background look and let TTL have it's way.

Lots of very nice photos were to be had - here is one of my daughters which turned out OK

Image
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: A Box of Soft Light...

Postby biggerry on Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:40 pm

looking good Rodney, a couple of observations:

1) the lighting is quite bright and prominent and hence stands out from the BG alot.
2) Position of the light could be higher up to get more shadow under the nose.
3) Obviously in this case a second light or reflector could have helped give the RHS of teh face some more fill light.

I am interested as to why you chose f4, i would have thought opening up to 2.8 would have given more BG light and possibly a more balanced scene (from a lighting point of view)

All that said, the face is nice and sharp and she looks happy and relaxed - that counts for alot imo.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: A Box of Soft Light...

Postby Remorhaz on Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:33 pm

Thanks Gerry :)

Just to preface - I shot quite a few of these images (over 50 in under 25mins) and the light was dropping rapidly - it was just one child after another (and sometimes two together). This was very impromtu and the kids themselves were hand holding the softbox so positioning the light/subject was a bit random from shot to shot (basically each child who just had their shot taken generally wanted to hold the softbox for the next child)

biggerry wrote:2) Position of the light could be higher up to get more shadow under the nose.
3) Obviously in this case a second light or reflector could have helped give the RHS of teh face some more fill light.


Yep these are givens - basically the height and direction of the light was essentially dictated by the height/positioning of the previously shot child now holding the softbox :)
I did consider using a reflector but after having decided to give this a try in the first place I had about 30 seconds to setup before we were shooting and then about 10 seconds with each child before they wanted to try holding the softbox and the next child moved in I gave up :)

biggerry wrote:1) the lighting is quite bright and prominent and hence stands out from the BG alot.
I am interested as to why you chose f4, i would have thought opening up to 2.8 would have given more BG light and possibly a more balanced scene (from a lighting point of view)


Agreed - at start the shots had much brighter sky/background (we were basically in twilight at the start). The first few were at f/2 and I wasn't getting quite enough depth of field so moved to f/2.8. I was already at 1/250th (sync speed) and the sky was still a bit too bright for my liking so I moved to f/4 to kill it a bit more. But over time the sky got darker and darker quite quickly so I moved the shutter a little - ended up at 1/125 for the children a few after this one and In the end it didn't matter the sky was black anyway so I had faces floating in total black (which was also ok). I probably should have opened the aperture up over time as well but it was a mad rush to the finish :) This shot of my daughter was probably just over half way through the whole sequence.

biggerry wrote:All that said, the face is nice and sharp and she looks happy and relaxed - that counts for alot imo.


Actually some of the others were a lot better (it's always the way that I have much better shots of other children than my own :)).

It was fun though - I might do it again sometime next year but do it earlier (before the sun has set) and setup beforehand with softbox and reflector on lightstands - although there is quite a bit of height variation between kindy kids and year 6's and I like the softbox close
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques