Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Remorhaz on Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:07 am
Since I'm posting images of my girls - here is another... A quick grab of my youngest whilst she was attending the birthday party of one of her classmates... This is indoors (but near windows) - straight ambient light, handheld with the 50/1.4 (I LOVE this lens for candid portraits).  NIKON D7000 + 50.0 mm f/1.4 @ 50 mm, 1/125 sec at f/2, ISO 100
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by biggerry on Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:59 pm
nice one Rodney. Its interesting to see how the D7000 handles skin tones, I find its similar to the D300 and probably D90 but quite different to the older D80 for example. I often find the skin tones if correctly exposed or slightly over exposed take on a very pinkish warm tone which I don't like or reckon is totally accurate, however its always quite correctable by dialing the exposure back half a stop or more then shadow recovering, I find that gives more realistic tones - not saying this image is incorrect btw. Good expression and you could also crop to get more impact if so desired - i found my eye wandered to the kid in the pink shirt.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Steffen on Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:22 pm
The notion of "accurate skin tones" always intrigues me, since it gets a lot of attention without much to go by. If you put ten people in a row you will get ten different skin tones, varying much more wildly than the subtleties Gerry was getting at. Not only that, skin tones change a lot when one exercises, gets emotional, feels not quite healthy etc.
There seem to be certain tones that are easily recognised as incorrect or off, but generally speaking I'm not sure in how far the viewer of a photograph can judge whether the skin tones have been reproduced accurately or not.
Cheers Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
-

Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by Geoff M on Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:21 pm
Very nice - a square crop may be the go to eliminate the child with the pink shirt which as Gerry has stated draws the eye away from the main subject.
-

Geoff M
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
- Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.
by Remorhaz on Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:33 pm
biggerry wrote:Good expression and you could also crop to get more impact if so desired - i found my eye wandered to the kid in the pink shirt.
That's fair enough I guess - he is the birthday boy after all 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Remorhaz on Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 pm
biggerry wrote:I often find the skin tones if correctly exposed or slightly over exposed take on a very pinkish warm tone which I don't like or reckon is totally accurate
I looked back at the original image - I had actually warmed the image here to taste in post from the as shot with Auto ISO (increased temp a bit over 300K and +7 towards magenta on the tint) - it didn't make a huge difference but it has some - as you say even the as shot is a little pink (which personally I like).
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|