Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Remorhaz on Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:09 pm
Over the weekend on the spur of the moment we decided to head over to Cockatoo Island in Sydney Harbour where we spent a late afternoon, early evening wandering around until sunset. Cockatoo Island is a very interesting location with lots of photographic potential. Unlike last time we stayed on the island this time the large industrial buildings were open to the public and I could go in at take the opportunity to shoot some images of the gritty buildings, decaying machinery and rusty beams with the intent to later post precess using HDR (High Dynamic Range) techniques. Also on show on the island were many of the artworks and exhibits from Outpost (a street art festival held on the island in November). Feedback, comments, critique, whatever welcomed  First up a monochrome conversion of an HDR of some heavy machinery in a room full of graffiti art  With the following I'm not sure which of the two I prefer the most for this setting - the over the top super surreal look or the more subdued realistic look   Outside the Boring shop - I didn't think it was uninteresting   and last up a more detailed view of the outside of one of the buildings up on the top of the island 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Reschsmooth on Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:23 pm
I am not a big fan of the HDR look, personally, as I feel it flattens the image too much, removing too much of the shadow detail. However, that is a personal view and I know many people do like the more obvious HDR look.
I do like the last shot as it has some nice patterns in it.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Wink on Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:34 pm
Remorhaz wrote:the more subdued realistic look
I prefer that one.
-

Wink
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:23 pm
- Location: Seymour, VIC
-
by stubbsy on Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:09 pm
Wink wrote:Remorhaz wrote:the more subdued realistic look
I prefer that one.
Me too. I also like the last image.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by aim54x on Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:05 pm
I am definitely a fan of the "realistic" HDR, but it is the mono that does it for me!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:06 am
my preference is the first, i think with a bit of dialling back of teh glowish effect and highlight recovery it would work fine and dandy.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Remorhaz on Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:48 pm
Thanks for the feedback fellas - always useful getting the feeling from others (Cameron - the mono is my pick too  ) For those who didn't really like the HDR's you're likely to be unhappy with some others I'm processing now (will post tomorrow probably) 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Big V on Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:08 pm
I too favour the first image as it has more impact, the other colour images are fine and for me the last is my least favourite as it does not fit in with what you have done with the others in this series.
Canon
-

Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
by zafra52 on Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:32 pm
Some times the effects we put in pictures and the image manipulation can work against the picture. I prefer the last one.
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by darklightphotography on Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:32 pm
I like the third best of the colour images, the other version doesn't have enough dark in it for my liking. I like the mono as well, although I can't help seeing a darker more brooding version in there.
A nice series.
-
darklightphotography
- Member
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:12 pm
by surenj on Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:27 pm
#3 for me - I reckon it's got the right gritty feel/emotion without having the obvious HDR 'look' which sometimes tend to dominate.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by Remorhaz on Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:55 pm
Thanks everyone  Also note that the last image is not an HDR (it's a straight capture - not even a polariser although the sky kinda looks like it had it) - just in case anyone was mislead 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|