Glouster tops waterfallsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Glouster tops waterfallsActually go to go out for a few days, which was really great.
While the orchid and fungi show was OK we also took a look at some falls. Unfortunately we could not get to the base of the largest set due to topography and no ropes. Small set of falls in full sun with an nd filter (borrowed from mate as I did not even contemplate this sort of pic before leaving). Slightly larger set further up the river, same situation. What do we think of the crop and lighting of these please people? Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsThe second one has a great composition and could be cropped a bit tighter on teh falls if so desired. on both images the colours feel very muted, i would hit them with a bit of shadow recovery followed by a touch of brillance/vibrancy or whatever they call it nowadays then bump the contrast.
I note that the forum resize has made them look a bit fuzzy, viewed in separate window that aspect is all good. I love the area up there in the Barrington tops and Gloucester, amazing place.. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsThanks Gerry I'll give that a go.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsThey do look better Gerry, is this the sort of thing you had in mind?
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsHi Colin - I'm not really feeling much for the first but that second image has definite potential - the composition and silky water is very nice. The rework is better but I think you could get even more out of it - although may now need to do so selectively so you don't turn the watery bits too green/nuclear.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Glouster tops waterfalls
beat me to it! here is what I had in mind, a couple of simple steps i used 1) d-lighting/levels curves to lift the shadows 2) add warmth (the water makes it look very blueish) 3) saturation/vibrance 4) contrast 5) 'u point' on the right side on the rocks to lift more light out 6) crop - this is the most important one I reckon, the crop means the water falling into teh pond is at one intersection of the thirds and the top of the falls is almost at the other, the swirling water on the bottom right leads you inot the image beautifully. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfallssame diff on the first image, which upon further inspection has good potential too, mainly due to that set of rocks steps that leads from teh RHS
as usual let me know if you want them removed. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfallshmm, i actually don't mind teh second image as posted by you (Colin) in the second set, the darker scene could actually work too, however I still reckon a crop could help...
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsAaaah yes Gerry, that is much more like what it looked like on the day.
I also now see possably what Rodney was thinking of as well. There is deffinately more going on in the larger falls. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfalls
They all work on one level or another Gerry. Depends upon what you see in, or expect from, the image before, during, and after the fact. No way would I want you take down your reworks, it helps to show everyone what you were on about. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsThe 2nd image as you re-posted is the best for me!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsColin - What Cameron said. One of the better milky waterfall shots I've seen.
Where are these falls? Are they anywhere near Gloucester? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsI quite like the original 2nd but, I must admit
the the reworked one is growing on me and I think now it is a good improvement on an already good photograph.
Re: Glouster tops waterfalls
Thanks fellas, Peter, They are about an hour up into the Glouster tops. The turn off is about 10Km before Glouster. If you drive to the upper river (basicly end of the road) then walk 1km or so along the track down river they are off to the right of the path and pretty easy to get to. There are other sets further down but I was not keen to lug gear through the water and rapids to get to them. I had already fallen over into the water the previous day, to the amusement of my mates. I was not even a metre from completing the crossing when I lost my footing and timbled sideways. The temp made me get up pretty quickly so no water entered my bag or gear and I was cool for the rest of the afternoon. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsThanks Colin. It's a pretty area and I've been that way a few times. I'll mark it down for a future visit.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsHey Colin, I was wondering why this (the first waterfall) looked familar! I really want to go back there now
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsNice Gerry, you seem to have had less sun on your visit.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsHi Colin, 2nd image of the second attempt is good but I reckon the blacks look clipped. Gerry's version has reasonable shadow detail but greens are too much. So somewhere in-between may be the go from my POV.
Re: Glouster tops waterfalls
yeah cloudy as all buggery then, back in the point and shoot days.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Glouster tops waterfalls
So something more like this then. I must say I like this better than the first effort. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Glouster tops waterfallsClin, from my POV this is much better and balanced. I prefer the cooler tones as they match with the blue/green in the image.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|