Critiques please?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Critiques please?Hi
This is just a quick shot I took of 3 year old Pia last week. I'd like to hear your reviews of it, as I haven't had much feedback on photos in the past (except for wedding shot reviews by those I've assisted) and how you think the shots like this could be improved, for future reference. Unfortunately, I can only seem to get it to appear in this post as a small size, but it can be viewed larger in Pixspot. I followed Stubbsy's "How To" sticky post but am I doing something wrong? Thanks.
hey nikonfan,
are you linking to the thumbnail rather than the full image? its hard to tell how sharpness and dof is played out in your images but a general for portraits is not to break the nose over the cheek line. Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Lovely portrait Nikko. The reason only the thumbnail sized pic is showing in you post is because that is what you asked it to show. You copied and pasted the properties of the thumb rather than the full sized image
Re: Critiques please?
Hi Nikkofan - u are VERY close to the mark..but you have to go to the large image in pixspot and then go to properties of THAT image, not the thumbnail. Here is how it should be: This is yours: http://www.pixspot.com/albums/userpics/thumb_Pia.jpg this is mine: http://www.pixspot.com/albums/userpics/normal_Pia.jpg As for the photo you took, it's 'nice' but nothing extra ordinary if you want my honest opinion. I think you could do a bit with it with the contrast etc and I would have much preferred to see all of Pia's face, not just one side of it. I might have a play around with it if you don't mind.. Geoff.
Nikko - a beautiful shot - angle is great and the expression - priceless.
Geoff - nice work - Nikko your shot was a tad flat Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I haven't heard this before but would really like to know what it means. Could you explain it more, Redline? IMO trying to demonstrate tonal changes by posting here may be futile. I doubt that what I'm actually seeing is what Geoff saw on his monitor when he posted it. Monitors differ, compression changes things a little, I've found that even just uploading to Pixspot seems to wash things out a little bit. BTW little Pia is a doll. What amazing big blue eyes. Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
Pia's photoThanks those critiques & for the tweaking Geoff.
I agree with the improved effect of the contrast, etc - looks much better. Interesting that you said you would like to see the whole of the face because, knowing her so well, I thought the angle of the face and the inquisitive expression captures her pretty well. But, you're right, another angle would have lent, well, "another angle" to the story, so to speak. I would also like to know more about the Portrait Rule mentioned - haven't heard of this. Oh, and you're right - IMHO, she is a doll (well, most of the time ... Terrible Threes notwithstanding!) You certainly know what to say to the Proud Parent! Thanks again for your critiques - it's given me more ideas and a bit of encouragement.
Nice photo, I like the combination of colours (blond hair and pink shirt) which gives this 'doll' aspect. The light is Ok and, from the moment you've got the sharpness right, the idea is to pretty much experiment with different poses / expression, establish a good rapport with the subject and have fun (and yes, take a lot of pictures!)
Link
I have little problem with the tonal range or the contrast...it's the composition. All of the visual energy drops down through the bottom of the image in the vicinity of her chin. Her eyes, nose hairline and chin all lead the eye out of the image area. But don't let that discourage you....try again...and perhaps ask her to look for her reflection in the lens...this way you will get eye contact, and eye contact is quite powerful.
Regards
Matt. K
As you said - it is subjective, but personally I think you probably overdid it in Photoshop... On my monitor it looks as if Pia has lipstick and other make-up on... Probably not appropriate... I agree that the original was a little flat, but I wouldn't have tweaked the colours that much... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Maybe compensate for the added contrast with a touch of desaturation?
e.g. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Nikkofan:
i like this portrait for its unique composition, angle.... great shot! i cant see the original image tho, im getting the lil red X
a general rule"a general for portraits is not to break the nose over the cheek line"
sorry for not replying i been out for the past few days. from your pic you can see that the childs nose is overlapping her right cheek, which is a general no-no. just having her tilt her head to the left to bring back the right side of her face. sorry vincent iam going to quote one of your photos here Most of my golf shots have broken this rule but i'am not game enough to stand any futher in front of this ppl and cop a golf ball. anyway, rules were meant to be broken Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Thanks Redline
When I thought about this rule and looked at other portraits, it became fairly self-explanatory! I can see what you mean by the portrait you've just posted - very nice and it does make a difference seeing the whole of the face. But I'm a stubborn little git and I still like the angle of Pia's face in this portrait! That doesn't mean that I won't try to stick to the rule in other portraits though Thanks for your feedback - appreciated (despite stubborn streak!)
Nikkofan - as redline has stated rules are mean’t to be ignored, sometimes - if we stayed with rules then we would not produce photos that stay with us for a long time.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
np.
its good to know the rules before you break them. Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|