Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby Remorhaz on Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:19 am

Here are some of my images from our morning exercise at Sydney Uni...

All feedback, criticism, critique, etc gratefully accepted...

My take on a stark monochrome rendition of one of the modern structures

Image

and from the other side and below with an extremely wide view - I'm not entirely happy with this image - it's got the very distorted hard angular view I was going for and the diagonal from bottom left to top right - but it isn't gelling for me and I don't know why...

Image

Two views of the corridors of Hogwarts :)

Image

Image

and a colour view of the interior of the main quad - HDR question of the day: is it or isn't it (no cheating :))?

Image
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby photohiker on Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:34 am

Corridor 1 is the pick for me.

Image 2, the one 'not gelling' - HDR? Ghosting is distracting and the overhead walkway doesn't appear to have enough support on the right of the image. It looks better (IMO) if the bottom is cropped so that the lower edge of the walkway just intersects the bottom of the image.
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby biggerry on Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:40 pm

#1, I like the BW processing, it maybe a little contrasty and stark for me, but I know thats how you like it :) The halo/glow on top of teh buildings is a little off but not a show stopper, the composition is ok but does not make me fall out my chair. :D I guess i say that since there does not feel to be a definitive focal point, plety of lines but not a hard location to lock the viewer in. The funky tower is blended into teh scene too much to work as the primary focus point.

#2 nah does not do anything for me, I have a similar one from closer up and I like the details and depth in the glass that the HDR brings but as a wide angle I find yours and also mine pretty uninspiring. I think this part of teh building could work better with a nice tight view on the corner section coupled with teh right angle.

#3 Probably the best composition of teh lot imo. the vanishing point of teh corridor and the main quad tower in teh 3rd intersection coupel nicely together. The BW is not too intense and sits nicely for me. The only downer from my view is the greyed/haloed sky, I think making the sky a consist shade would work better, whether that be white or grey.

#4 a bit too stark? missing another element? dunno.

#5 HDR? sure it is, just depends on your definition of HDR :wink:
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby Remorhaz on Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:53 pm

photohiker wrote:Corridor 1 is the pick for me.


Thanks - good to know :)

Image 2, the one 'not gelling' - HDR? Ghosting is distracting and the overhead walkway doesn't appear to have enough support on the right of the image. It looks better (IMO) if the bottom is cropped so that the lower edge of the walkway just intersects the bottom of the image.


Yeah I think the crop could look better but I'm still feeling like it's a lost cause :(

biggerry wrote:#1, I like the BW processing, it maybe a little contrasty and stark for me, but I know thats how you like it


:)

#2 nah does not do anything for me


:)

#3 Probably the best composition of teh lot imo. the vanishing point of teh corridor and the main quad tower in teh 3rd intersection coupel nicely together. The BW is not too intense and sits nicely for me. The only downer from my view is the greyed/haloed sky, I think making the sky a consist shade would work better, whether that be white or grey.


Thanks Gerry - I was trying to preserve a smidge of detail in the sky when I should have just let it go :cheers:

#4 a bit too stark? missing another element? dunno.


Not sure - personally somehow I liked this one (heavier B&W processing maybe) perhaps even more than #3

#5 HDR? sure it is, just depends on your definition of HDR


Aw now thats cheating - you know what I mean :)

Redefined question: is this multiple images/exposures either tonemapped or even just exposure blended or layer blended?

Thanks for the feedback :up:
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:55 am

While I like the contrast from the black and white, I can't say I'm liking the HDR treatment but I've always been biased against HDR.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:21 pm

Rodney

#3 is stellar, made more so by your smart composition with the large hole on the right framing another view of the surrounding buildings. Superb.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby Remorhaz on Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:43 pm

PiroStitch wrote:While I like the contrast from the black and white, I can't say I'm liking the HDR treatment but I've always been biased against HDR.


Thanks Piro - I also like contrasty black and white - I am finding however that for some images if I HDR them first and then convert to black and white I get a better end result.

stubbsy wrote:#3 is stellar, made more so by your smart composition with the large hole on the right framing another view of the surrounding buildings. Superb.


Thanks Peter :)
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby Remorhaz on Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:25 am

I reworked a few of the images based on suggestions so...

For the first I tried to even out the sky and reduce the spread of haloing around the buildings, in the second I cropped and tried to even out the sky and reduce the haloing on the lhs and in the third took Gerry's advice and let the sky go :)

Image

Image

Image
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby biggerry on Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:29 pm

Remorhaz wrote:in the third took Gerry's advice and let the sky go :)


looks shitloads better imo.

The crop on the glass building does look better too.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby surenj on Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:32 pm

Remorhaz wrote:Two views of the corridors of Hogwarts

To echo other peoples' comments, the compo here is superb. I don't feel inspired by the HDR though. I think it would be more 'art print like' and subtle if you just dodged and burnt or manually blended various exposures...

Remorhaz wrote:HDR question of the day: is it or isn't it (no cheating )?

I got alot of shots with similar color saturation SOOC with the polariser. So I vote no HDR.

Remorhaz wrote: I'm not entirely happy with this image - it's got the very distorted hard angular view I was going for and the diagonal from bottom left to top right - but it isn't gelling for me and I don't know why...

Yeah I agree. Hit delete from disk [and from backup]
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Rodney's Sydney University Architectural...

Postby Remorhaz on Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:54 am

surenj wrote:To echo other peoples' comments, the compo here is superb. I don't feel inspired by the HDR though. I think it would be more 'art print like' and subtle if you just dodged and burnt or manually blended various exposures...


Thanks Suren. omg! photoshop!! - I'm not sure I can do that :) - however I believe I will try just processing the single 0EV image in Lightroom and see what I can do.

I got alot of shots with similar color saturation SOOC with the polariser. So I vote no HDR.


and we have a winner (incl CPL). I actually took brackets for almost everything we shot (incl this) but found I liked just some minor PP on the 0EV image in this case.

FYI for comparison what about this one...

Image

Yeah I agree. Hit delete from disk [and from backup]


... harsh :)
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques