FacelessModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
FacelessOne from the weekend, which I photographed for a friend's dance production. The theme behind the image was exploring relationships, particularly the fear, constriction, isolation and hope that comes part and parcel of any relationship..
This is one of the series but I won't be uploading the rest as yet. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: FacelessGreat image, and great treatment.
Well done. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: FacelessA nice BW conversion, definitely needs a narrative since its too open ended for teh viewer to decide on the intent of the artist/image. The image invokes alot of emotion and I think a title or comment would really spearhead this emotion.
I guess my first thoughts, without reading the explanation, had little to do with relationships and your noted aspects. I see a couple of key elements that really convey a sense of the image for me, 1) the prison slit in teh wall, which gives teh obvious impression of imprisonment 2) reaching/looking towards the light (from a dark place) 3) the covered face, this carries alot of intent and prejudice but also de-personalises the image/scene. (don't read that twice, cause it won't make sense )
any chance of expanding on that Gary, i for one am interested in why others think this is also a good image. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Faceless
You mean I have to justify what I've said? God help us! First of all, Wayne has nailed the mono conversion.To my eyes, this looks exactly like what a good B&W image should look like, with a wonderful range of tones that runs the full gamut of the grey spectrum. The background is full of character; it could be an old prison. Given the nature of the shoot, it might only be a stage set, and if so, all credit to the set dresser. Look not just at the graffiti on the wall, but also at the detritus on the ground. And yes, there's also the texture on the walls ... Then there's the dress: the texture, the folds, the interplay of light and shadow here. Finally, for me, there's the pose. Is she reaching for freedom? A helping hand? Or is she just a member of the Federal ALP casting her vote? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Facelessto me this is just a excellence shot the B W suits it to a T as Gary said with a wonderful range of tones that runs the full gamut of the grey spectrum. every part of the shot has something in it no blank space. it just great.
Re: FacelessConceptual photography is always difficult to pull off and this image hits the mark with what I think is beautiful technical quality and a sense of mystery. It's a rather bizaar image in that one can sense raw emotion, pain and isolation...yet those emotions are not clearly given a context. The viewer has to do some work with this image...for instance, is there any significance in the fact that we see only 1 arm and 1 foot...and what is the significance of the shroud. The image has a dirty, gritty character that would translate beautifully to a high quality, large very glossy print. The lighting is just perfect and beautifully controlled. This is 1 of the more interesting images to be posted of the forum for some time.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: FacelessThanks everyone for your comments. I must admit conceptual photography isn't everyone's cup of tea, and it's a challenge undertaking it as well. It's part of the process of pushing my own style and exploration as a photographer. But I digress.
From the responses so far, I'm more inclined to provide further context to the theme or concepts around the image. My approach and preference has always been create the initial interest, then let the viewer look more into the image and decipher the message for themselves. This approach is still under development as it's hit and miss Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Faceless
Thanks Gary and the others that commented - i learnt something from this thread. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|