Testing the 17-35mm - IRModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Testing the 17-35mm - IRWith sunny conditions, an itch to test some more lenses and amazingly a bit of time off work I managed to get out and shoot some IR today. Nothing too flash, just an outing to Mrs Macquaries Chair.
I started off in the CBD, this seemed more of a monochrome image... As I moved away from the buildings and into the greenery....some false colour trickery seemed to be fitting I can now happily add that the AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 is a fine infrared lens (at least for my camera) I couldnt get this lens to hotspot, and it was difficult to get this lens to flare. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Testing the 17-35mm - IRThey look fantastic cam. Very nice wb choice. Care to share your wb and pp workflow.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IR#4 has nice composition Cam. Print it after you clone those buildings out! Perhaps Metallic?? I wonder how that would turn out.
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IRYep that last one is very nice (the last two in fact) - so is this your IR D70?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IR
White Balance was a custom preset I took ages ago...it worked well so I havent changed it since, it can be hard at times to find a nice green patch of grass in full sun! Workflow is as follows: -take photo (RAW, Custom WB, standard colour mode) -open in CNX2 -adjust exposure (Quick Fix -> Exposure Compensation) -adjust hue (LCH -> Hue -> 180 deg -> drag all the way up) this is the equivalent of a Red/Blue channel swap -D-Lighting (if applicable) -adjust contrast (if applicable) NOTE: if I decide to go to a monochrome image I will not bother to adjust hue (channel swap) and then do the conversion after I have adjusted exposure/d-lighting/contrast Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IR
Thanks Suren....metallic print would be interesting.
Thanks Rodney. Yes these are from my D80 IR (720nm), it is the only Nikon I own that is sensitive to IR enough to be useful, although I am yet to test the J1 (not holding my breath) Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IRawesome stuff man!
Loving the blue hues and the white tones. Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing. Don't be so negative! http://www.photomarcs.com
Re: Testing the 17-35mm - IRThey are all very nice images, but I believe
the second is the best. It works better than the others for me.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|