Project 2065Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Project 2065I have posted on this topic before to no acclaim.
I am trying to undertake a relatively major project of capturing the 4 suburbs that encompass the 2065 postcode. My primary approach is B&W medium format, but took a few with the D200. As I am able to go back and effectively replicate and improve on shots, I appreciate feedback. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Project 2065pat, #2 is absolutely beautiful. not a huge fan of the others.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Project 2065#3 is a great shot but the stairs seem to be leaning a bit left.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Project 2065#1 - retro to the max, i wish it had more of a 80's feel to it, however given the context of teh surrounding items I do not think thats gonna happen...maybe a tighter crop?
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Project 2065#3 is the best in my book. I like the contrast of
colours and lines in it. I also like the first one, but I have a problem with it, as is. Part of the stand is cut offand so is the left and right of the image so sort of taking the same photo again and add more context, I would instead crop off all the unecessary elements and concentrate on the essential - the ball machines themselves. You got enough colour and elements to attract and keep the interest of the viewer. Unfortunately, the other pictures might be good, but I fail to appreciate them.
Re: Project 2065#2 would be improved by including a human figure...maybe blurred to show movement.
Re: Project 2065Thanks for the feedback guys.
Chris, I have taken a number of shots of that part of the overpass as I love the simplicity of it. Most of my other shots are on film and I will hope to print some off soon. Suren, interesting suggestion - quite a while ago, I saw some other people doing a shoot under that section with a lass in a bikini. I had to slow down for the set of lights Regarding the stairs, again, I feel my best shots of this have been taken on film that I have yet to print off. I think I have overcooked this on in post. I do like the lolly jar and will try alternative crops. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Project 2065
I would have pretended to have a car breakdown.....
Re: Project 2065Given the advice of a tighter crop, I have tightened the crop. I think it adds to the image whilst retaining the colourful environment in which it was found. C&C appreciated again.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Project 2065The crop is the dogs bollocks
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Project 2065
I can't imagine that is a good thing Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Project 2065I suggest keeping initial crop and lightpainting at night to ensure the surrounds a 1.5 stops under; sort of a surreal look.
Re: Project 2065I like the 2nd and 4th one. The 4th one mainly because you timed it right. On its own without any cars, it wouldn't have been as strong as what you've capture.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Project 2065I prefer this second posting of the cropped image,
for the reason you mentioned and also for the fact you left out the Optus signs that took away from the image. I think this version has more impact.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|