Reworked midday tree

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Reworked midday tree

Postby PiroStitch on Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:42 am

So the previous attempt didn't make me happy so I worked on it some more.

Before
Image

After
Image

I wanted to accentuate the texture of the clouds in the background which would increase the highlight on the tree.

Thoughts?
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Reworked midday tree

Postby chrisk on Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:48 am

I like the second version better, the first was a little flat. Not convinced on the image as a whole though.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby Reschsmooth on Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:17 am

I prefer the first as a photograph and the second as a fantastical image, less related to reality, if you know what I mean.

Whilst not possible, a bigger tree would have more impact.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby Matt. K on Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:10 pm

I much prefer the first image....a classic B&W shot...but it could do with just a touch of brightening. I like the dark and moody look. Second image has been way overdone in my opinion. By the way....it is an excellent photograph in the style of Ansel Adams. I love it!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby biggerry on Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:04 pm

first one all teh way home... the sky and clouds are very nice, the boosted contrast in the second has just overcooked it. I am with Matt, just a little brightening and a small touch of contrast.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby surenj on Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:59 pm

I would also prefer somewhere inbetween #1 and #2.

Rooz wrote:Not convinced on the image as a whole though.

:agree:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby PiroStitch on Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:31 pm

Matt. K wrote: By the way....it is an excellent photograph in the style of Ansel Adams. I love it!


Thanks Matt. That's what drew me to the spending the time to photograph the tree.

surenj wrote:
Rooz wrote:Not convinced on the image as a whole though.

:agree:


Good thing I only shoot for my own pleasure then :wink:
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby surenj on Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:38 am

PiroStitch wrote:Good thing I only shoot for my own pleasure then

Doubt it. I am no art buyer/artist (appreciater) although I don't know about Rooz. :P Despite this I gave two cents worth. Go figure.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby Remorhaz on Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:23 am

I'm also in the preferring #1 camp for this image with perhaps a little more lightening behind the top of the tree. But I can see where you were going with the second (I find myself heading the same way with a number of my monochromes these days).
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:24 am

Ok taken most of the constructive feedback on board and given it another whirl.

Image

Here's a 100% crop of what I see on my screen. The smaller version really doesn't do it enough justice.

Image
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:30 am

That is significantly better and a great balance between the two. AA would be proud. (But change the tree :) )
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby surenj on Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:35 pm

You are in the zone with #3. :mrgreen:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Reworked midday tree

Postby zafra52 on Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:13 pm

I believe the 3rd one is an improvement
on 1, and 2. It's has more light than 1 and
is less sharp than 2 and this makes it looks
more natural.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques