Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Remorhaz on Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:48 pm
We had a better than average sunset tonight so on the way home from picking up my eldest from school band my girls and I stopped at one of the harbour foreshores nearby and took in the sunset. As it happens I need an image which "is inspired by colours" and was hoping my esteemed friends here could help me choose one of the following three as the best image to fit the bill (or go home you're dreamin') - and of course any PP suggestions are most welcome. All were taken with the 10 Stop ND + 3 Stop Hard Grad  NIKON D7000 + 12.0-24.0 mm f/4.0 @ 12 mm, 120 sec at f/8, ISO 100  NIKON D7000 + 12.0-24.0 mm f/4.0 @ 12 mm, 240 sec at f/9, ISO 200  NIKON D7000 + 12.0-24.0 mm f/4.0 @ 12 mm, 211 sec at f/11, ISO 200
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Mr Darcy on Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:43 pm
Of these I would pick number three But if it was up against Gerry's http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?p=441587#p441587I owuldn't bother
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by aim54x on Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:11 pm
I prefer #2, but it would benefit with some experimentation in crops....there is an epic feel about the sky
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by TonyT on Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:22 am
Number 2
-

TonyT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
- Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT
by TonyT on Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:25 am
Number 2 "but it would benefit with some experimentation in crops" Maybe some off the bottom
-

TonyT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
- Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT
by Reschsmooth on Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:27 am
TonyT wrote:Number 2 "but it would benefit with some experimentation in crops" Maybe some off the bottom
What tony said Cameron said. I think the movement of the boats, as unavoidable as it is, detracts from the images.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by PiroStitch on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:15 am
Either the second or the third one, though the rocks need a bit more fill light in them. Not to the point that it has equal exposure to the rest of the image, but just enough to balance it out a bit.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by sirhc55 on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:59 am
#1 - all suffer from movement in the background but #1 has the best definition in the rocks + colour
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by surenj on Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:24 pm
Hi Rodney,
Because the clouds AND the boats are moving, these pictures don't work for me. Do you by chance have any with a still sky + still boats? If so you could try combining those.
Perhaps just try one moving element to see whether it works; it might.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by zafra52 on Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:01 pm
2 or 3 would be my piock, thought 1 is clearer in details
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4855
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by Remorhaz on Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:34 pm
Mr Darcy wrote:Of these I would pick number three But if it was up against Gerry's I owuldn't bother
Yeah - I know  aim54x wrote:I prefer #2, but it would benefit with some experimentation in crops....there is an epic feel about the sky
TonyT wrote:Number 2 "but it would benefit with some experimentation in crops" Maybe some off the bottom
Thanks - I like the base of rocks at the bottom so I'll probably stick with it for now  PiroStitch wrote:Either the second or the third one, though the rocks need a bit more fill light in them. Not to the point that it has equal exposure to the rest of the image, but just enough to balance it out a bit.
Thanks - I'd already done mega shadow recovery at the bottom but I think the problem was it then lacked any contrast - no shadows at all to go with the lighter parts of the rock - it was all sort of equally dull - see below... Reschsmooth wrote:What tony said Cameron said. I think the movement of the boats, as unavoidable as it is, detracts from the images.
sirhc55 wrote:#1 - all suffer from movement in the background but #1 has the best definition in the rocks + colour
zafra52 wrote:2 or 3 would be my piock, thought 1 is clearer in details
surenj wrote:Because the clouds AND the boats are moving, these pictures don't work for me. Do you by chance have any with a still sky + still boats? If so you could try combining those. Perhaps just try one moving element to see whether it works; it might.
Bingo - I think.... here we go - as it happens I did have a few frames taken immediately after this compo (without the bigstopper) - 4 sec exposures so much less boat movement. So I've opened them both as layers and tried in my clumsy way to blend them together - taking the sharper (and lighter as it happens) boat body images from the 4 sec exposure and blending with just about everything else from the other. I also did some different work with the rocks at the bottom. Sort of lighter and darker which i think gives it more depth and solidity. So Thankyou everyone for your input so far and here is the result to date - what do you think? 
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Mr Darcy on Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:38 am
Now that's beginning to look nice.
What I particularly liked about #3, given the "Colours" theme, were the blues coming through in that image. Perhaps raise the luminance and/or saturation of the blue channel a tad to bring these out. Not too much or you'll wash them out.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by surenj on Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:49 am
Yet. Better.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by Mj on Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:06 pm
So my thoughts are... the last image is the one to work on. I think you should be able to get a little more detail from the foreground rocks but don't over do it. Then i would look at what i can do to highlight the rightmost boat to make it a focal point of the composition. Otherwise the image lacks purpose in my view... of course there may be other ways to get a similar outcome... but that's my first thought.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
-

Mj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
- Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}
by Remorhaz on Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:38 am
Mr Darcy wrote:Now that's beginning to look nice. What I particularly liked about #3, given the "Colours" theme, were the blues coming through in that image. Perhaps raise the luminance and/or saturation of the blue channel a tad to bring these out. Not too much or you'll wash them out.
Thanks Greg - did you mean to try and bring more blue out in this last (landscape) image or the original #3? I tried with the last image but there just wasn't enough there to drag anything out (without just creating ugly noise and artifacts) surenj wrote:Yet. Better.
 Mj wrote:So my thoughts are... the last image is the one to work on. I think you should be able to get a little more detail from the foreground rocks but don't over do it. Then i would look at what i can do to highlight the rightmost boat to make it a focal point of the composition. Otherwise the image lacks purpose in my view... of course there may be other ways to get a similar outcome... but that's my first thought.
Thanks Mj - by rightmost boat I assume you mean the large one just to the left of centre and not some miniscule thing on the far right? I should be able to highlight that centre one more fairly easily (since I originally burnt all those ones down quite a bit as they were too bright). I know it doesn't look like it in the web image but in my large full size image theres quite a bit more detail in the foreground rocks and they look brighter - not sure why the jpeg conversion is dulling that area down noticably.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by Mr Darcy on Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:32 am
Remorhaz wrote:Thanks Greg - did you mean to try and bring more blue out in this last (landscape) image or the original #3? I tried with the last image but there just wasn't enough there to drag anything out (without just creating ugly noise and artifacts)
I meant to bring the blues/violets out in the new image. But if there's nothing to work with. C'est la vie. Remorhaz wrote:not sure why the jpeg conversion is dulling that area down noticably.
Could it be the conversion to sRGB?
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by Reschsmooth on Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:04 pm
I think the rework works. I wouldn't touch the rocks too much as I think, as they are, they provide a nice frame for the real subject being the boats and colours.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|