I love it whenModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I love it whenPeople relax and the camera loves it!
This one taken with a borrowed 50mm f/1.8 I cropped as in the original I aimed a bit high... So comments? New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
1. I like it.
2. The subjects - or as others might say, the people - look relaxed 3. The 50mm 1.8 is a lens to covet, methinks, or as Birdy would say "I lust the lens" 4. When you have 3000 x 2000 pixels, a bit of cropping is no problem 5. Matt will be positively orgasmic that the main subject is smack dab in the middle. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Danke..
I'm thinking about going straight to the 1.4... one less lens to buy that way... But I will own one of the two... amazing lens... just makes things punch! And the eye contact is great! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
That nice isn't it????? LOL One great lens, I love mine Cheers Ray >> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
What is the difference between 1.8 and 1.4 - is it a whole stop? The 1.4 is $550 or so, the 1.8 is $240. The price difference is a decent chunk of change. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
When I look at the optical profile on the maxwell site (lets see if I can hotlink)
1.4: 1.8: Its just more glass! Plus buying the 1.4 now means I will not buy the 1.8 now and the 1.4 later! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
MHD wrote: Plus buying the 1.4 now means I will not buy the 1.8 now and the 1.4 later!
Exactly....I'm going through that exercise as we speak. I bought the 70-300G zoom in June and I think it's hopeless especially from 200mm out. So now it's on to the 70-300ED, which I've demoed and is much better. Same sort of exercise with fiters. Santa's coming early here. Al. No matter how long he looks at the menu, he always orders the mustard prawns.
Good grief
Here I am, at work all day, slaving away and then when I get home I find you've all been happily chatting away on this forum for most of the day about lenses and shots and all manner of stuff! Shame, shame and more shame on all of you Cheers Graham
I love working in IT... Basically sit on the Internat untill something happens Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
Excellent depiction of the physical difference - yep, it is a lot more glass in the 1.4 But - extra glass notwithstanding - is 1.4 to 1.8 a whole stop? What do you get for the extra $300? More glass, yes. But is it the difference between 1/30 and 1/60? I am interested. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
More glass and a much bigger hole through the lens...
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Responding to Allan a couple of posts above.
I thought that the 70-300G and the 70-300ED were basically the same lens. Ken Rockwell has a (slightly eccentric) review of both of them on his site. I don't know if he is full of it but he certainly sounds convincing and has some nice shots on his site. Regards
Jonesy
I agree with this... thats why I bought the G type lens..
they have (AFIAK) exactly the same optical profile except the ED lens has one ED element and its not a critical bit of glass... while some (Gary) will disagree I have no probs with my G lens and it is not duplicated by anything I have or want What will replace it is a bit of fast long glass ($$$$$$$) for when I am rich (Hell I'm still a student earn bugger all!) New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Hey, If this the case then TSA and Customs will have a good look at you, 1 x D70 with 10 x 70-300G lens, then who's going to bail you out huh? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|