More Olympus EM-5 imagesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
More Olympus EM-5 imagesI really like the files coming out of the EM-5. Shooting kids at 9fps makes for very quick filling of memory cards, but the whole shooting experience is very nice. I'm looking forward to seeing how the raw files stack up, but the Olympus jpg's seem good thus far.
Here's a couple of images I shot today, processed: Nick300512a by Ozimax, on Flickr Nick300512w by Ozimax, on Flickr President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: More Olympus EM-5 imagesWhilst I think the subject is well handled...the bokeh looks awfully harsh. It competes with the foreground in my opinion.Tha'st a characteristic of the lens.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: More Olympus EM-5 imagesI like the Olympus point and shoot and I have had so
far 3 of them, but they are reknown for theis soft lenses. Nice photos of the kid, though.
Re: More Olympus EM-5 images
'tis true Matt. The lens used in these particular images is the very el cheapo 40-150mm. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear! The bokeh from the 45mm is much better I think. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: More Olympus EM-5 images
True enough statement, until I bought the 45mm 1.8 a short while ago. It is super sharp, as is (by all comments) the Olympus 12mm F2. It sure is pricey though. President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: More Olympus EM-5 imagesThe Panasonic 14mm f/2.8 is not bad, compact, and pretty economical too. ($200 or so on ebay when I picked one up)
The 45mm rocks.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|