Wide Angle MelbourneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wide Angle MelbourneI was in Melbourne over the weekend, and have finally managed to sit down and sort/process my images. Here are some of the better images from this getaway. I settled on taking my D700 + 17-35mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.8, I was able to borrow my girlfriends Tamron 90mm f/2.8 during the trip as well. These were all taken with the 17-35mm.
All C&C is welcome! The shot tower Silhouettes at the National Galleries Chinatown at night St Patricks Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Wide Angle Melbourne#2 - nice!
#4 - maybe a bit too much leaning going on and I don't much care for the modern glass building on the left - maybe a vertical compo with the horizon in the middle when taking the shot would have worked better with the UWA. D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneI like the first three. The fourth one looks nice
till you realise the building on the left looks more precarious than the Leaning Tower of Pizza.
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneThanks guys...I will have a play with a Square or a 5x4 crop for #4 I didnt notice that building until you pointed it out Rodney
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Wide Angle Melbourne#2 and #4 are excellent! Composition is perfect and the images have been carefully processed. Love em.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneWould love to see some shots of the Tamron 90mm mate
Cheers,
Adrian Nikon user
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneLovely stuff. #1 and #4 for me.
If you feel inclined to, you can correct the verticals in Lightroom though you'll end up having to crop part of the image. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Wide Angle Melbourne
I didnt end up using the 90mm much, but the last image from this set is one from the 90mm http://dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=42557
Thanks Matt, I have to admit that #2 is pretty much out of camera, but #4 is a 9-frame HDR processed with HDR Efex (NIk).
Thanks Piro....I have played with some crops for #4 and am leaning to just cropping off the leaning glass tower in the far left. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Wide Angle Melbourne#1 is a tremendous image. I think t'would be better without the black triangle in the lower left hand corner, but I'm not sure how you could get rid of it. (I don't think even CS5 "content aware" manipulation would help in this instance.) Nevertheless, great photo all the same.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneI hope you don't mind Cameron, but I have had a play around with the first photo and I think CS5 has done a half reasonable job of getting rid of the black triangle. (I'll delete it if you don't like it. )
test by Ozimax, on Flickr Ozi President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneThanks Ozi that triangle removal looks good. I have another variation of this image that may also be of interest
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneCameron
For me that first image is the standout. It's got great leading lines and nice counterpoint between the harsh black of the superstructure and the softer browns of the building. To be honest my eye was so strongly drawn to the top I didn't notice "the black triangle". Not a fan of the version with more triangle though Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Wide Angle MelbourneThanks Stubbsy!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|