BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby biggerry on Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:49 pm

In my quest for BW goodness, sometimes after the fact I find a image that appears to work better as BW. I really try hard not to just try BW when I don't like image in the hope it will make it better, rather try and pick scenes and shots that lend themselves to the BW conversion.

Here is another I am interested in thoughts on. I like all teh elements thrown in, the person on the left (photographer), the small empty seat and the boat. This was teh second shot after realising that positioning the sun in the tree created some nice rays.

Critique, good bad and fugly welcome

Image
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Steffen on Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:55 am

I reckon it's often worth trying a BW conversion. If you think of colour as an additive and ask yourself, "does colour enhance the central message of the image?" you sometimes find that it doesn't. Gifted photographers can answer this question before even hitting the shutter release, but plonkers like me are thankful to have those options to play with after the fact.

I like your image in BW, even though it's hard to judge whether it would have been better in colour without seeing it. What makes the image for me is the sun in the tree. The ambition you had for the empty seat does not really come to fruition, as the seat is hardly noticeable in the image. I like the idea, but the bench would have to be put into scene much more prominently, though leading lines, light, contrast or whatever means.

Overall I think it's a good image, the soft flowing ground and curves of the tree punctured by the sun spikes make it very attractive.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Murray Foote on Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:21 am

I really like the tree and the sunlight coming through and the lone walker and the park bench and the general composition.

What I find for me doesn't work so well is that my eye keeps going to the LIDO on the side of the ship. Removing the lettering might help. It may be a sacrilege to suggest it but I also think the image may improve if you crop in to the right of the tree to the left of the ship. You lose the park bench but in the new image you focus much better on the tree, the sunlight and the walker.
User avatar
Murray Foote
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Ainslie, Canberra

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby aim54x on Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:41 am

I love the rays coming through the tree.....simply glorious! But it feels slightly too HDRish for my overall liking. I would be tempted to knock back the exposure slightly and see what I get.

Do you have a colour variant?
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:10 am

aim54x wrote:I love the rays coming through the tree.....simply glorious! But it feels slightly too HDRish for my overall liking. I would be tempted to knock back the exposure slightly and see what I get.


Again, due to laziness, I am outsourcing my feedback. :agree:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby aim54x on Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:09 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Again, due to laziness, I am outsourcing my feedback. :agree:

:biglaugh: :up:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Mj on Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:22 pm

Pretty much what Steffen said...
You could always play with the title... call it 'LIDO' and let the viewer work out why.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:35 pm

Gerry
The image has some lovely elements and the conversion to B&W is very fine. The image is lacking a real point of interest and needs something in the bottom right foreground area. What you have there is a superb background for something special yet to be photographed.Go back and take abeautiful model with a bicycle and a greyhound. Play with it. :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:38 pm

Hey Garry!
Everytime I post something with the 3 letters mod in it the letters come up green??? Like modus operandi..
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: BW - the photographer, the fig tree and the ship

Postby biggerry on Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:55 pm

Steffen wrote:I reckon it's often worth trying a BW conversion. If you think of colour as an additive and ask yourself, "does colour enhance the central message of the image?" you sometimes find that it doesn't. Gifted photographers can answer this question before even hitting the shutter release, but plonkers like me are thankful to have those options to play with after the fact.

I like your image in BW, even though it's hard to judge whether it would have been better in colour without seeing it. What makes the image for me is the sun in the tree. The ambition you had for the empty seat does not really come to fruition, as the seat is hardly noticeable in the image. I like the idea, but the bench would have to be put into scene much more prominently, though leading lines, light, contrast or whatever means.

Overall I think it's a good image, the soft flowing ground and curves of the tree punctured by the sun spikes make it very attractive.

Cheers
Steffen.


Cheers Steffen, teh crux of it is really the seat ain't big enough or more correctly not close enough to the camera. With regards to 'seeing' BW images, whilst it would be great to just have this ability, i think if you started off in colour then it takes some effort and re-training to really be able to picture and plan and see an sucessful image in BW, those who started in BW or used it more extensively in teh film days certainly have a advantage..

Murray Foote wrote:I really like the tree and the sunlight coming through and the lone walker and the park bench and the general composition.

What I find for me doesn't work so well is that my eye keeps going to the LIDO on the side of the ship. Removing the lettering might help. It may be a sacrilege to suggest it but I also think the image may improve if you crop in to the right of the tree to the left of the ship. You lose the park bench but in the new image you focus much better on the tree, the sunlight and the walker.


lol, nice spotting Murray, it does stick out a bit, however did not bother me as such (to start wih anyway), however now that you have really pointed it out it's hard to get outta my head! Good poitn about the crop, i suspected this might be a improvement on the image, even at the expensive of losing the bench as a element.

aim54x wrote:I love the rays coming through the tree.....simply glorious! But it feels slightly too HDRish for my overall liking. I would be tempted to knock back the exposure slightly and see what I get.
Do you have a colour variant?


fair call, i do have a colour version, but i do not like it :| - whilst it has a large dynamic range, i find having the texture and detail on the shadow side of the tree really makes the image.

Reschsmooth wrote:Again, due to laziness, I am outsourcing my feedback. :agree:


nothing wrong with that :up:

Mj wrote:Pretty much what Steffen said...
You could always play with the title... call it 'LIDO' and let the viewer work out why.


Thanks Mj, thats agood idea with teh title - never woulda thought of that.

Matt. K wrote:Gerry
The image has some lovely elements and the conversion to B&W is very fine. The image is lacking a real point of interest and needs something in the bottom right foreground area. What you have there is a superb background for something special yet to be photographed.Go back and take abeautiful model with a bicycle and a greyhound. Play with it. :D :D :D


Thanks matt, the conversion and BW option is really the bit I am interested in, i agree with teh empty space on the right, cropping may solve this to an extent.

However playign with a model, bike and greyhound sounds like alotta fun, do i have take photos of that :shock:

thanks for the feedback guys.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques