A simple Red Rose with the D800EModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A simple Red Rose with the D800EMy macro lens (Zeiss 100mm f2) has a 1:2 ratio so I'm not likely to do any bugs eyes, etc.
But I had a crack at a red rose just for the fun of it. Comments welcome: Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800EGorgeous. Looks like a pretty high f stop to get that dof. Nice job. Now who are you going to send it to?
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800EThat I take it is a demonstration of the dynamic range of the D800E.
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800E
What appealed to me Murray was the ability of the camera to handle the reds. Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800EI expect I'll get one but I don't have an actual need for it for a while. Lloyd Chambers says the D800 can take more sharpening which erodes the difference between it and the E. Thom Hogan says the E's greatest advantage is wide open which is counter-intuitive. Not sure which I'll get. Perhaps it doesn't matter.
But your image just started me thinking. Flowers are well known for their gamut-challenging colours and the same applies to live music. For live music, the obvious choice would be my D3s. But with some lighting setups, where the light is dominant red or blue, it can be difficult to get good tonality. So it might be an interesting test to use a D800, scale it back to 12MP and see what difference the extra two stops of dynamic range makes.
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800E
Agreed. I've been subscribing to Lloyd Chambers for a few years now. The photography that I tend to do lends itself to the E but as you say there's little in it. The camera requires a little more care of technique due to the pixel pitch as opposed to my previous camera - the D3. Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800ELovely image.
As you say, great rendition of the red. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: A simple Red Rose with the D800EIt is a lovely photograph. I always found reds
a challenge and few cameras are capable (the ones I have) to capture a credible red.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|