Crows Nest in VelviaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Crows Nest in VelviaI recently grabbed some photos of the local area on a stunning Sunday morning with the Bronnie and a couple of film backs loaded with Velvia 50 and Efke 50.
Here are some of the Velvia, hand-scanned via the D200 (can't wait to get the Epson V700 - eventually). Pretty much uncorrected but cropped. Thoughts appreciated. I dialled in about -1/3 stop exposure to avoid blowing out the highlights, as I have done in the past, but they look at about 1/3 under - go figure. I am very much looking forward to trying some 4x5" Velvia soon! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Crows Nest in VelviaLove the colours from this film.
How are you metering? From a lightmeter? Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Crows Nest in Velvia
Thanks Wayne. Using the Bronica's metered viewfinder. I find it is generally accurate but wanted to err on the side of caution. However, I believe I have gone too far this time in underexposure. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Crows Nest in VelviaThe blue of the sky is just stunning but I do suppose that is helped by the under exposure, which has unfortunately been too much for the shadows.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Crows Nest in VelviaIs it a centre weighted meter? Looking at the way the images were composed, if it took an average of the sky and the shadows I would have considered putting it a 1/3 stop over rather than under. The light looked harsh enough to warrant it. Anyway it's film, so there should still be enough detail in the shadows to pull it out
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: Crows Nest in VelviaI would have used average metering, which encompasses the entire image, but weighted towards the centre.
Dialing in -1/3 comp was a result of unnecessary conservatism based in previous overexposure in similar circumstances. However, the previous situation may have been one in which I accidentally spot metered or overly weighted to shadow areas. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|