Waterfallage prior to photochop meetModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Waterfallage prior to photochop meetGerry, you missed the good light while you were running around like the blue arsed fly with out a jacket.
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetVery nice light indeed! I really have to reclaim my weekends sooner rather than later!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetnice ray-age there Suren , how about giving it a whack with the saturation and contrast, it feels a bit flat at my end, also a bit of vignetting on the bottom part to really send the viewer to the falls.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetnice rays there Suren - the bottom is a bit of a jumble for me tho - perhaps chop the bottom third off?
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetSuren
Is that a shaft of Photoshop shining down the slope?? I'm sure that's one of the topics that I covered on Sunday. Regards
Matt. K
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meet I would never insert shafts of photoshop into my pictures! They are straight out of camera (I let the camera do all the edits with JPG).
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetOK boys I have taken your critique ideas and slightly altered the color etc...
Uncrapped Crapped
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetI prefer the first rendition of this image with its cooler tones. The foreground details give the image more depth over the cropped version.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetThanks Geoff, I am in two minds about it. I actually warming up to the crop.
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetNote to self....next time take a pocket knife to trim dead fern leaves....
Also, didn't think to get a picture with fern keeping still.
Re: Waterfallage prior to photochop meetSuren, i like both versions of the last two posted, the crop works, but I think the uncropped one works as well.
That small amount of air movement was annoying with the ferns, but can't be helped.. cheers for braving the cold gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|