by Reschsmooth on Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:09 am
Interesting read.
I think the "right" competition is worthwhile, and "right", in my mind, typically means that you are not giving up perpetual, royalty free, blah blah rights and licences to the organisers. That is, I will not enter competitions that are stock photo grabs by the promotors.
Alternatively, paying $30 or so to enter a competition from which I retain my rights to the image(s) for a chance to win $50k+ (Moran), or a decent camera (Head-On, B+W Mag, etc) is not a problem at all. If I have the time to spend, then there are the benefits of pushing to me to produce excellence, as defined by my ability. Practically, that is why I have been pushing the tulip photos on this forum to seek feedback from people I respect as I will be entering them into a competion.
If you happen to win any of the "right" competitions, despite the small scale circulation, it still provides some bragging rights that you can then expose via your own channels. That no-one has heard of XXX competition/magazine/museum/whatever doesn't mean you can't promote the fact that you won it.
I was a "finalist" in the Moran prize a few years ago and I was chuffed. Couldn't bank the 'chuffness', but it felt good.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug