Macro - no stacking

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Macro - no stacking

Postby aim54x on Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:17 pm

Some macros snapped whilst roaming around Ku Ring Gai Nat Park. Without a flash, and using the 105VR hand held I felt severely limited with the amount DOF I could achieve.

Image

Image

Image
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Macro - no stacking

Postby Geoff M on Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:23 pm

Looking good Cam. I like the second best for the simplicity, just a shame the main subject flower was not filing the frame a little more.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Macro - no stacking

Postby biggerry on Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:56 pm

I am with Geoff here, the second is nice, i would like to see it a bit lighter and if you are gonna crop it, i would crop it such that the flower is off centre, that however, is just a preference thing. That flower and composition is one that is suited to limited DOF.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Macro - no stacking

Postby Remorhaz on Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:31 pm

I want to like the first but not quite there for me. I actually like the third the best.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Macro - no stacking

Postby Mr Darcy on Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:57 am

Remorhaz wrote:I want to like the first but not quite there for me. I actually like the third the best.

:agree:
#1 I really would like a different DOF. Perhaps more or perhaps just have that bud in the centre in full focus
#2 would benefit from croppage. Perhaps a square format
#3 is my pick but I think it has been oversharpened to put "focus" in where it wasn't in the first place. That central open flower has a distinctly fuzzy outline caused, I think, by sharpening to the point of noise being brought out. Then a mask has been applied to cut the noise back, resulting in those fuzzy edges. I recognise it because I have a nasty habit of doing the same thing
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Macro - no stacking

Postby aim54x on Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:39 am

Thanks guys!

Mr Darcy wrote:#3 is my pick but I think it has been oversharpened to put "focus" in where it wasn't in the first place. That central open flower has a distinctly fuzzy outline caused, I think, by sharpening to the point of noise being brought out. Then a mask has been applied to cut the noise back, resulting in those fuzzy edges. I recognise it because I have a nasty habit of doing the same thing


Actually that is pretty much straight out of camera (converted from NEF to JPG via CNX2), I wish I had spent the time doing what you have described, my D300 usually has its in camera sharpening slightly higher then normal so this is showing through in the conversion.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques