BouquetModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
BouquetThis is a bit of a quick and dirty image of a dried bouquet that we have had for years. I wanted to give it a dark yet soft type mood. C&C appreciated.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: BouquetNice, ticks the boxes for dark and somewhat for soft, i might take a literal approach to the soft and consider a extra step in the processing to get some diffusion, even selectively outside of the main focus area.
I think the vase it just a fraction too prominent since it seemed to draw my eye quite quickly, maybe just a slight crop may minimise its impact? Other options... and i am just thinking out aloud here, maybe a desaturated colour version? All in all I like it and any improvements would only be minor refinements. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: BouquetHi Patrick - the vase or whatever it is calls my eye too much so somehow it needs to go - I know that might mean the flowers just hang in space but I think in this case it would be preferable. I like the roses and the tones spread throughout so that part is very nice. If I was to be super critical I think given that the tips of almost all the roses are sharp, that the ones at the very top which are more oof would have been better if they were as sharp (in the same plane of focus) - I don't mind and quite like that the focs falls away as you go down the stems.
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: BouquetThanks for the comments. Regarding the vase, you may be right with its dominance in the image, but I feel it needs it as an anchor. I will try toning it down to make it more subtle.
I will see how a desaturated version appears. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: BouquetLoving the tones and textures...ditto about the vase
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: BouquetOkey dokey. I have acquiesced to the suggestions of Gerry & Rodney and here is the result.
Oh, Rodney, I have no way of controlling focus on this one. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Bouquetfor me, leaving some of the vase in is essential, also the crop you have done seems to affected the overall feel, i think mainly resulting from the loss of negative space.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
BouquetIt bother me that's it's centered in a landscape format with so much pace on either end, But that's just me.
I think it needs the vase but tone it down a tad, it's a little too bright. Overall a very nice image though. Thumbs up on texture and light. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Bouquet
What do you mean, Chris? This is in portrait mode. In case anyone is interested, this image was created using the Epson V700 scanner. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: BouquetA final version with part of the 'vase', but cropped a little and reduced in exposure.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: BouquetSpot on for me now, nice one.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Bouquet
Oh...ok...on my iPad its showing as landscape. I think it's cos it's black on black border so it looks like its landscape when viewed in full screen. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|