Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby biggerry on Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:36 pm

I always recognized that taking and processing images with snow in them would be tricky - I am keen for some feedback on a few of these in particular with regard to colour balance / white balance.

Thoughts, good, bad, brown or offwhite ?

The start of long walk (thru water:) )

Image

Image

Image

Image
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby aim54x on Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:49 pm

Cant comment about colours...but these are looking very nice!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby Geoff M on Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:13 pm

I am looking at these on an uncalibrated laptop screen so take that into consideration with my comments.

Addressing the white balance I think they all look OK with exception of perhaps #2 where the snow looks a little grey.

#1 Nice compo and leading lines. The angle of the hill on the right gives me a feeling that the horizon is not level - but of course it is not the case.

#2 is very nice and while I like the water movement in #1 this image has more appeal with the slower shutter speed and the resultant mikly water effect. I reckon some judicial cropping to just above the grass stems in the lower left would make the compo stronger but to keep the same aspect ratio (which I think you need) will of course remove some detail from either the left, right or both sides. This would possibly detract from the image.

#3 is my pick of the bunch, nice compo, reflection, cloud formation, green stuff :wink: , its got everything going for it.

#4 I like too. do you have a landscape orientated version with this inlet/outlet in the same position within the frame?
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby stubbsy on Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:46 pm

Gerry

Like Geoff I think only #2 has real WB issues - a bit on the blue grey side on my monitor (perhaps even a magenta hint). Likewise the water.

Compositionally though #2 is the standout. Oddly #3 which should appeal doesn't and I hate to say it, bit I think it's the crop. I'd have liked more rule of thirds with the reflecting line on the lower third I think.

The last image needs a focal point (someone / something at the snow line perhaps) as my eye jumps between the top and bottom halves which are essentially two very different images in their own right.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby aim54x on Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:00 pm

I am happy to confirm what Stubbsy has said RE WB
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby Remorhaz on Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:22 pm

Lots of WB feedback already

As far as like factor for the images - for me they got better as we went down.

The first doesn't do anything for me, the second is better - but it's really the silky water which is doing it for me - I actually like a horizontal pano crop of the middle!

The third - no we are talking - I unfortunately don't agree with Peter with the ROT crop - I like seeing the pebbles clearly at the bottom :)

... and #4 is the winner for me - I reckon there's the tiniest tinge of magenta/brown in the clouds just up from the middle and in the grass at the bottom (but not the snow) - nothing onerous for me tho
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby robert on Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:02 pm

Remorhaz wrote:
As far as like factor for the images - for me they got better as we went down.

The first doesn't do anything for me, the second is better - but it's really the silky water which is doing it for me - I actually like a horizontal pano crop of the middle!

The third - no we are talking - I unfortunately don't agree with Peter with the ROT crop - I like seeing the pebbles clearly at the bottom :)

... and #4 is the winner for me - I reckon there's the tiniest tinge of magenta/brown in the clouds just up from the middle and in the grass at the bottom (but not the snow) - nothing onerous for me tho



Same, really like the 4th though can see the point about lack of focal point- but personally i find that a very hard task- sometimes you just have to use the lines (stream) to lead to something beyond (the vista). I think thats what' separates my shots from ones that grab your attention. Kind of like my shots are just digital reproduction and not quite something artisitic and interpretive of the scene.

Unlike the Seascapes which commonly use the ND, this set has got me wanting something heavier than just my polariser dropping a few stops. Dont think i need varaible but something like an ND400.
Nice stuff Gerry,

Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby biggerry on Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:49 pm

Thanks for the feedback regarding the WB/colour issues guys, its appreciated.


Geoff M wrote:#2 is very nice and while I like the water movement in #1 this image has more appeal with the slower shutter speed and the resultant mikly water effect.

Remorhaz wrote:but it's really the silky water which is doing it for me


silky water lovers :roll: :wink:


Geoff M wrote:I reckon some judicial cropping to just above the grass stems in the lower left would make the compo stronger but to keep the same aspect ratio (which I think you need) will of course remove some detail from either the left, right or both sides. This would possibly detract from the image.


Yes, I see where your coming from here, I will have a look at that and see ho wit plays out with the top side too, cheers Geoff.

Remorhaz wrote:- I actually like a horizontal pano crop of the middle!


a crop from the middle ehh.. interesting, whilst not quite what you are referring to the image below does play on that wider view a bit more.

Image


Geoff M wrote:#3 is my pick of the bunch, nice compo, reflection, cloud formation, green stuff , its got everything going for it.


cheers Geoff, just needs a wider view imo.

Geoff M wrote:#4 I like too. do you have a landscape orientated version with this inlet/outlet in the same position within the frame?


I do, however have not yet processed it, it did not jump out at me, I will however have a look and advise :)

stubbsy wrote:Compositionally though #2 is the standout. Oddly #3 which should appeal doesn't and I hate to say it, bit I think it's the crop. I'd have liked more rule of thirds with the reflecting line on the lower third I think.


I agree regarding the 3rd, I actually thought I had taken a few more frames extra on both sides but seemed to have a brain fade at the time and missed half teh shots - the original intent was a wider pano which may have given a different impact (better) for the position of teh horizon.

stubbsy wrote:The last image needs a focal point (someone / something at the snow line perhaps) as my eye jumps between the top and bottom halves which are essentially two very different images in their own right.

Fair call - i will bring a blow-up model next time (thats all I could probably carry ;) )

Thanks for the feedback Peter.

Remorhaz wrote:The third - no we are talking - I unfortunately don't agree with Peter with the ROT crop - I like seeing the pebbles clearly at the bottom


Thanks Rodney, the super clear water and the subsurface matter was a primary part of this shot, however as mentioned, is was meant to be much wider which I think would have changed the impact for teh better.

Remorhaz wrote:... and #4 is the winner for me - I reckon there's the tiniest tinge of magenta/brown in the clouds just up from the middle and in the grass at the bottom (but not the snow) - nothing onerous for me tho


Cheers, a little selective adjustment and I will get rid of that.

robert wrote:Unlike the Seascapes which commonly use the ND, this set has got me wanting something heavier than just my polariser dropping a few stops. Dont think i need varaible but something like an ND400.
Nice stuff Gerry,


Robert, the world of ND's is a bit addictive for a number of reasons, one of which is the ability to really change the way a scene appears without banging it on the head with PP. If you have grad filters etc I would strongly recommend the slide in ND filters, they are much more user friendly than the circular screw in ones which can be overly annoying to use. This is where the vari-ND is good cause you can still compose with it on.

I have merely learnt to compose without looking thru the camera and taking one or two test shots at high iso to confirm, it works OK now but is still annoying.

Thanks for looking and commenting mate.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby stubbsy on Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:40 pm

biggerry wrote:
stubbsy wrote:The last image needs a focal point (someone / something at the snow line perhaps) as my eye jumps between the top and bottom halves which are essentially two very different images in their own right.

Fair call - i will bring a blow-up model next time (thats all I could probably carry ;) )

As long as that's the sole use for the (ahem) model Gerry :-)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)

Postby biggerry on Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:38 am

Geoff M wrote:I reckon some judicial cropping to just above the grass stems in the lower left would make the compo stronger but to keep the same aspect ratio (which I think you need) will of course remove some detail from either the left, right or both sides. This would possibly detract from the image.


Image


Geoff M wrote: I like too. do you have a landscape orientated version with this inlet/outlet in the same position within the frame?


wider
Image

and wider :)

Image
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
User avatar
biggerry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5930
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques