Blue Lake (a cold one at that)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Blue Lake (a cold one at that)I always recognized that taking and processing images with snow in them would be tricky - I am keen for some feedback on a few of these in particular with regard to colour balance / white balance.
Thoughts, good, bad, brown or offwhite ? The start of long walk (thru water:) ) gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)Cant comment about colours...but these are looking very nice!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)I am looking at these on an uncalibrated laptop screen so take that into consideration with my comments.
Addressing the white balance I think they all look OK with exception of perhaps #2 where the snow looks a little grey. #1 Nice compo and leading lines. The angle of the hill on the right gives me a feeling that the horizon is not level - but of course it is not the case. #2 is very nice and while I like the water movement in #1 this image has more appeal with the slower shutter speed and the resultant mikly water effect. I reckon some judicial cropping to just above the grass stems in the lower left would make the compo stronger but to keep the same aspect ratio (which I think you need) will of course remove some detail from either the left, right or both sides. This would possibly detract from the image. #3 is my pick of the bunch, nice compo, reflection, cloud formation, green stuff , its got everything going for it. #4 I like too. do you have a landscape orientated version with this inlet/outlet in the same position within the frame? Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)Gerry
Like Geoff I think only #2 has real WB issues - a bit on the blue grey side on my monitor (perhaps even a magenta hint). Likewise the water. Compositionally though #2 is the standout. Oddly #3 which should appeal doesn't and I hate to say it, bit I think it's the crop. I'd have liked more rule of thirds with the reflecting line on the lower third I think. The last image needs a focal point (someone / something at the snow line perhaps) as my eye jumps between the top and bottom halves which are essentially two very different images in their own right. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)I am happy to confirm what Stubbsy has said RE WB
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)Lots of WB feedback already
As far as like factor for the images - for me they got better as we went down. The first doesn't do anything for me, the second is better - but it's really the silky water which is doing it for me - I actually like a horizontal pano crop of the middle! The third - no we are talking - I unfortunately don't agree with Peter with the ROT crop - I like seeing the pebbles clearly at the bottom ... and #4 is the winner for me - I reckon there's the tiniest tinge of magenta/brown in the clouds just up from the middle and in the grass at the bottom (but not the snow) - nothing onerous for me tho D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)
Same, really like the 4th though can see the point about lack of focal point- but personally i find that a very hard task- sometimes you just have to use the lines (stream) to lead to something beyond (the vista). I think thats what' separates my shots from ones that grab your attention. Kind of like my shots are just digital reproduction and not quite something artisitic and interpretive of the scene. Unlike the Seascapes which commonly use the ND, this set has got me wanting something heavier than just my polariser dropping a few stops. Dont think i need varaible but something like an ND400. Nice stuff Gerry, Robert Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)Thanks for the feedback regarding the WB/colour issues guys, its appreciated.
silky water lovers
Yes, I see where your coming from here, I will have a look at that and see ho wit plays out with the top side too, cheers Geoff.
a crop from the middle ehh.. interesting, whilst not quite what you are referring to the image below does play on that wider view a bit more.
cheers Geoff, just needs a wider view imo.
I do, however have not yet processed it, it did not jump out at me, I will however have a look and advise
I agree regarding the 3rd, I actually thought I had taken a few more frames extra on both sides but seemed to have a brain fade at the time and missed half teh shots - the original intent was a wider pano which may have given a different impact (better) for the position of teh horizon.
Fair call - i will bring a blow-up model next time (thats all I could probably carry ) Thanks for the feedback Peter.
Thanks Rodney, the super clear water and the subsurface matter was a primary part of this shot, however as mentioned, is was meant to be much wider which I think would have changed the impact for teh better.
Cheers, a little selective adjustment and I will get rid of that.
Robert, the world of ND's is a bit addictive for a number of reasons, one of which is the ability to really change the way a scene appears without banging it on the head with PP. If you have grad filters etc I would strongly recommend the slide in ND filters, they are much more user friendly than the circular screw in ones which can be overly annoying to use. This is where the vari-ND is good cause you can still compose with it on. I have merely learnt to compose without looking thru the camera and taking one or two test shots at high iso to confirm, it works OK now but is still annoying. Thanks for looking and commenting mate. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)
As long as that's the sole use for the (ahem) model Gerry Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Blue Lake (a cold one at that)
wider and wider gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|