HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESESometimes I just look at this stuff and wonder why I photographed it...what caught my eye...stopped me.....and made me go to the trouble to frame it and shoot it. And sometimes I gotta admit I don't bloody know.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEI can reassure you you are not the only one. It happens
to me too, but I blame on senility.
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEFor the first two - lines of course - the second may even make a good mono I reckon
I'm not sure what with the third - then again I'm a newbie so... D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEThe first is interesting that all for me.
Number 2 I really like it. The third does nothing for me.
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESESorry Matt, none of these do much for me
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEI quite like the 2nd, I wonder if cropping the rotten/unpainted pale on the right might improve it. Gritty mono conversion pehaps?
Robert Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEI like number two for the contrast between the new and the old rotting paling, but I think it should have a more contrasty processing.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESE
Exactly what I was thinking before I saw this reply.. Whenever I get a pic I'm unsure of like this I slap it into B&W and crank up the contrast. Things just work in mono Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEMatt, is it just me or do your horizons seem straighter since you bought the XPro?
Re: HMMM,JUST NOT SURE ABOUT THESEMatt, I like the second image, simple patterns with a standout feature always work well and you have shown us here a prime example. I think it is key to keep the colour in it (for me) since the lacquered panel really hits me as a anchor point.
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|